These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3715260)

  • 1. Dose-interpolation of immunoassay data: uncertainties associated with curve-fitting.
    Kay C; Nix AB; Kemp KW; Rowlands RJ; Richards G; Groom GV; Griffiths K; Wilson DW
    Stat Med; 1986; 5(2):183-92. PubMed ID: 3715260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of five curve-fitting procedures in radioimmunoassay.
    Nisbet JA; Owen JA; Ward GE
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1986 Nov; 23 ( Pt 6)():694-8. PubMed ID: 3800296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transforming signals into quantitative values and mathematical treatment of data.
    Baud M; Mercier M; Chatelain F
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1991; 205():120-30. PubMed ID: 1947741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty of measurement for 14 immunoassay analytes: application to laboratory result interpretation.
    Çubukçu HC; Yavuz Ö; Devrim E
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2019; 79(1-2):117-122. PubMed ID: 30626224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of the immunoassay curve fitting routine on bias in troponin.
    Badrick T; Ward G; Hickman P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Jan; 61(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 36282963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of variance function estimation on nonlinear calibration inference in immunoassay data.
    Belanger BA; Davidian M; Giltinan DM
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):158-75. PubMed ID: 8934590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of serial dilution error on calibration inference in immunoassay.
    Higgins KM; Davidian M; Chew G; Burge H
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 9544505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immunoassay of estradiol: unanticipated suppression by unconjugated estriol.
    Cao Z; Swift TA; West CA; Rosano TG; Rej R
    Clin Chem; 2004 Jan; 50(1):160-5. PubMed ID: 14709643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Simple Approach to Determine a Curve Fitting Model with a Correct Weighting Function for Calibration Curves in Quantitative Ligand Binding Assays.
    Xiang Y; Donley J; Seletskaia E; Shingare S; Kamerud J; Gorovits B
    AAPS J; 2018 Mar; 20(3):45. PubMed ID: 29536273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of various mathematical methods for computer-aided processing of radioimmunoassay results.
    Vogt W; Sandel P; Langfelder C; Knedel M
    Clin Chim Acta; 1978 Jul; 87(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 668130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extended standard curve stability on the CCD Magic Lite immunoassay system using a two-point adjustment.
    Lynch MJ
    J Biolumin Chemilumin; 1989 Jul; 4(1):615-9. PubMed ID: 2801246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of the uncertainty of analyte concentration from the measurement uncertainty.
    Brown S; Cooke DG; Blackwell LF
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2015 Sep; 75(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 25960201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Calibration and standardization in enzyme immunoassay].
    Kuwa K
    Nihon Rinsho; 1995 Sep; 53(9):2232-8. PubMed ID: 7474386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistically accurate estimation of hormone concentrations and associated uncertainties: methodology, validation, and applications.
    Straume M; Johnson ML; Veldhuis JD
    Clin Chem; 1998 Jan; 44(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 9550568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of human serum unconjugated estriol without derivatization using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry candidate reference method and compared with two immunoassays.
    Huang X; Zhang Q; Zheng S; Wang J; Han L; Lin H; Ke P; Zhuang J; Cao ZT
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2018 Sep; 410(24):6257-6267. PubMed ID: 30006726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method for direct estimation of imprecision profiles, with reference to immunoassay data.
    Sadler WA; Smith MH; Legge HM
    Clin Chem; 1988 Jun; 34(6):1058-61. PubMed ID: 3378320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating concentration estimation errors in ELISA microarray experiments.
    Daly DS; White AM; Varnum SM; Anderson KK; Zangar RC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():17. PubMed ID: 15673468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining the error of dose estimates and minimum and maximum acceptable concentrations from assays with nonlinear dose-response curves.
    Gottschalk PG; Dunn JR
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Dec; 80(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 16256244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of unconjugated estriol in serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and assessment of the accuracy of chemiluminescent immunoassays.
    Huang X; Spink DC; Schneider E; Ling H; Rai AJ; Rosano TG; Chen B; Cao ZT
    Clin Chem; 2014 Jan; 60(1):260-8. PubMed ID: 24255078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance characteristics of the UniCel DxI 800 immunoassay for the maternal serum quadruple test, including median values for each week of gestation, in Korean women.
    Lee JH; Park Y; Suh B; Song SM; Kwon OH; Kim JH
    Korean J Lab Med; 2010 Apr; 30(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 20445329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.