These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37152856)

  • 1. The Evaluation of Debris and Smear Layer Generated by Three Rotary Instruments Neo NiTi, 2Shape and Revo_S: An
    Ashraf H; Zargar N; Zandi B; Azizi A; Amiri M
    Iran Endod J; 2023; 18(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 37152856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy using Four Novel Nickel-titanium Rotary Instruments: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
    Kar PP; Khasnis SA; Kidiyoor KH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 29208788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Smear Layer Evaluation on Root Canal Preparation with Manual and Rotary Techniques using EDTA as an Irrigant: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.
    Manjunatha M; Annapurna K; Sudhakar V; Sunil Kumar V; Hiremath VK; Shah A
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Feb; 5(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 24155580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microscopic evaluation of cleaning efficiency of three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Bidar M; Moradi S; Forghani M; Bidad S; Azghadi M; Rezvani S; Khoynezhad S
    Iran Endod J; 2010; 5(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 23130047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of influence of different manufacturing methods on the cleaning efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium files.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    Microsc Res Tech; 2013 Mar; 76(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 23180471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Debris and Smear Layer Removal from Oval Root Canals Comparing XP-Endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and Manual Irrigation: A SEM Evaluation.
    Alakshar A; Saleh ARM; Gorduysus MO
    Eur J Dent; 2020 Oct; 14(4):626-633. PubMed ID: 32777834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of NiTi rotary and reciprocating instruments on debris and smear layer scores: an SEM evaluation.
    Poggio C; Dagna A; Chiesa M; Scribante A; Beltrami R; Colombo M
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2014 Dec; 12(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 24425380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Liu Y; Chen M; Tang W; Liu C; Du M
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):649. PubMed ID: 36577985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shaping ability of 2Shape and NeoNiTi rotary instruments in preparation of curved canals using micro-computed tomography.
    Faisal I; Saif R; Alsulaiman M; Natto ZS
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Nov; 21(1):595. PubMed ID: 34798874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of cleaning effectiveness of single rotary file OneShape and reciprocating F2 Protaper with Protaper Universal sequence: A SEM analysis.
    Saraf AA; Patil AC; Mangala TM; Mahaparale R; Mali S; Pawar S
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2020; 10(4):337-342. PubMed ID: 32714786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal with chitosan and MTAD.
    Zhou H; Li Q; Wei L; Huang S; Zhao S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jan; 21(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 29411728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Debris Evaluation after Root Canal Shaping with Rotating and Reciprocating Single-File Systems.
    Dagna A; Gastaldo G; Beltrami R; Poggio C
    J Funct Biomater; 2016 Oct; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 27763503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of size and taper of basic root canal preparation on root canal cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Plotino G; Özyürek T; Grande NM; Gündoğar M
    Int Endod J; 2019 Mar; 52(3):343-351. PubMed ID: 30129186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of GT rotary instruments.
    Gambarini G; Laszkiewicz J
    Int Endod J; 2002 May; 35(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 12059912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intracanal heating of sodium hypochlorite: Scanning electron microscope evaluation of root canal walls.
    Iandolo A; Amato M; Dagna A; Poggio C; Abdellatif D; Franco V; Pantaleo G
    J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(5):569-573. PubMed ID: 30294123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cleaning Effectiveness of Three NiTi Rotary Instruments: A Focus on Biomaterial Properties.
    Poggio C; Dagna A; Chiesa M; Beltrami R; Bianchi S
    J Funct Biomater; 2015 Feb; 6(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 25692796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals.
    Sharma G; Kakkar P; Vats A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC43-7. PubMed ID: 25954704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.