These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3715423)

  • 1. Noise and visual choice-reaction time. A large-scale population survey.
    Lahtela K; Niemi P; Kuusela V; Hypén K
    Scand J Psychol; 1986; 27(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 3715423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adult visual choice-reaction time, age, sex and preparedness. A test of Welford's problem in a large population sample.
    Lahtela K; Niemi P; Kuusela V
    Scand J Psychol; 1985; 26(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 4089563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intersensory facilitation and inhibition: immediate arousal and location effects of auditory noise on visual choice reaction time.
    Stoffels EJ; Van der Molen MW; Keuss PJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1985 Jan; 58(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 3976414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Next-day effects of alcohol and an additional stressor on memory and psychomotor performance.
    McKinney A; Coyle K
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2007 May; 68(3):446-54. PubMed ID: 17446985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No effect of noise on vigilance performance?
    Koelega HS; Brinkman JA; Bergman H
    Hum Factors; 1986 Oct; 28(5):581-93. PubMed ID: 3557457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noise, S-R compatibility and hand dominance.
    Smith A
    Scand J Psychol; 1988; 29(3-4):180-5. PubMed ID: 3232040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Effect of noise on human mental rotation performance].
    Han L; Wu X; Li X; Hu W; Wang T; Li X
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 1998 Aug; 11(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 11543244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factor analysis of choice reaction time in young and elderly subjects.
    Vrtunski PB; Patterson MB; Hill GO
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Oct; 59(2):659-76. PubMed ID: 6514507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise annoyance during the performance of different nonauditory tasks.
    Kjellberg A; Sköldström B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 1945718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise and task induced distraction effects on information processing: sex differences in smokers and non-smokers.
    Knott VJ
    Addict Behav; 1984; 9(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 6741670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise and the performance of a four-choice psychomotor task.
    Wheale JL; O'Shea NM
    Ergonomics; 1982 Nov; 25(11):1053-64. PubMed ID: 7173157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between cerebellar size and variation of reaction time during a visual cognitive task in normal subjects.
    Kamitani T; Kuroiwa Y; Li M; Ikegami T; Matsubara S
    J Neurol; 2003 Aug; 250(8):1001-3. PubMed ID: 12928926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental Stimulation Does Not Reduce Impulsive Choice in ADHD: A "Pink Noise" Study.
    Metin B; Roeyers H; Wiersema JR; van der Meere JJ; Gasthuys R; Sonuga-Barke E
    J Atten Disord; 2016 Jan; 20(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 23511552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of foot and hand reaction times among men: a methodologic study using simple and multiple-choice repeated measurements.
    Simonen RL; Videman T; Battié MC; Gibbons LE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 2):1243-9. PubMed ID: 7478883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related differences in response preparation: the role of time uncertainty.
    Bherer L; Belleville S
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2004 Mar; 59(2):P66-74. PubMed ID: 15014089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paired choice reaction tasks in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Nakashima K; Shimoyama R; Takahashi K
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1993 Mar; 87(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 8475686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motor-response generation as a source of aging-related behavioural slowing in choice-reaction tasks.
    Kolev V; Falkenstein M; Yordanova J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2006 Nov; 27(11):1719-30. PubMed ID: 16246465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of variations in force on fractionated reaction time in simple and choice conditions.
    Ito M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Oct; 71(2):595-602. PubMed ID: 2251092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inconsistency in reaction time across the life span.
    Williams BR; Hultsch DF; Strauss EH; Hunter MA; Tannock R
    Neuropsychology; 2005 Jan; 19(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 15656766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Routes to action in reaction time tasks.
    Frith CD; Done DJ
    Psychol Res; 1986; 48(3):169-77. PubMed ID: 3823334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.