These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37154879)

  • 1. Individual Differences in How Desirable People Think They Are as a Mate.
    Csajbók Z; Štěrbová Z; Brewer G; Cândea CA; De Backer CJS; Fernández AM; Fisher ML; Garcia JR; Kruger DJ; Massar K; Oberzaucher E; Quintelier KJP; van Geffen RE; Valentova JV; Varella MAC; Jonason PK
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Aug; 52(6):2475-2490. PubMed ID: 37154879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Women's Mating Strategies and Mate Value Are Associated with Viewing Time to Facial Masculinity.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Jul; 52(5):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 37245165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships.
    Mehmetoglu M; Määttänen I
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(4):1474704920979623. PubMed ID: 33371743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The synergistic effect of prosociality and physical attractiveness on mate desirability.
    Ehlebracht D; Stavrova O; Fetchenhauer D; Farrelly D
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Aug; 109(3):517-537. PubMed ID: 29250771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What's in a kiss? The effect of romantic kissing on mating desirability.
    Wlodarski R; Dunbar RI
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Mar; 12(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 25299759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-Rated Attractiveness Moderates the Relationship Between Dark Personality Traits and Romantic Ideals in Women.
    Birkás B; Láng A; Meskó N
    Psychol Rep; 2018 Feb; 121(1):184-200. PubMed ID: 29298572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex differences in perceived controllability of mate value: an evolutionary perspective.
    Ben Hamida S; Mineka S; Bailey JM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 Oct; 75(4):953-66. PubMed ID: 9825529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship dealbreakers: traits people avoid in potential mates.
    Jonason PK; Garcia JR; Webster GD; Li NP; Fisher HE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Dec; 41(12):1697-711. PubMed ID: 26445853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Women's Short-Term Mating Orientation and Self-Perceived Attractiveness in Rating and Viewing Men's Waist to Chest Ratios.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):543-551. PubMed ID: 33057831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endorsement of Social and Personal Values Predicts the Desirability of Men and Women as Long-Term Partners.
    Lopes GS; Barbaro N; Sela Y; Jeffery AJ; Pham MN; Shackelford TK; Zeigler-Hill V
    Evol Psychol; 2017; 15(4):1474704917742384. PubMed ID: 29152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of resource-gaining capacity on mate preferences: an eye tracking study.
    Zhao Z; Su W; Hou J
    BMC Psychol; 2023 Dec; 11(1):444. PubMed ID: 38111064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceived Effectiveness of Flirtation Tactics: The Effects of sex, Mating Context and Individual Differences in US and Norwegian Samples.
    Kennair LEO; Wade TJ; Tallaksen MT; Grøntvedt TV; Kessler AM; Burch RL; Bendixen M
    Evol Psychol; 2022; 20(1):14747049221088011. PubMed ID: 35331044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice.
    Jonason PK; Raulston T; Rotolo A
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 22468419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sociosexuality predicts women's preferences for symmetry in men's faces.
    Quist MC; Watkins CD; Smith FG; Little AC; Debruine LM; Jones BC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Dec; 41(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21882053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human nonindependent mate choice: is model female attractiveness everything?
    Vakirtzis A; Roberts SC
    Evol Psychol; 2012 May; 10(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 22947636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical attractiveness, attitudes toward career, and mate preferences among young Chinese women.
    Zhang H; Teng F; Chan DK; Zhang D
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Feb; 12(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 24525338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.