These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37154942)

  • 1. Referral rate and false-positive rates in a hearing screening program among high-risk newborns.
    Thangavelu K; Martakis K; Feldmann S; Roth B; Lang-Roth R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Oct; 280(10):4455-4465. PubMed ID: 37154942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: how and why.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Lin HY; Lin G
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):788-92. PubMed ID: 17948357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.
    Xu ZM; Cheng WX; Yang XL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Oct; 75(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 21802153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of analgesia with pethidine during labour on false positivity of newborn hearing screening test.
    Kadirogullari P; Yalcin Bahat P; Karabuk E; Bagci Cakmak K; Seckin KD
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6254-6259. PubMed ID: 33882796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prevalence and referral rates in neonatal hearing screening program using two step hearing screening protocol in Chennai - A prospective study.
    Vignesh SS; Jaya V; Sasireka BI; Sarathy K; Vanthana M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 79(10):1745-7. PubMed ID: 26296879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When should automatic Auditory Brainstem Response test be used for newborn hearing screening?
    Unlu I; Guclu E; Yaman H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2015 Jun; 42(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 25459495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An effective compromise between cost and referral rate: A sequential hearing screening protocol using TEOAEs and AABRs for healthy newborns.
    Shang Y; Hao W; Gao Z; Xu C; Ru Y; Ni D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():141-145. PubMed ID: 27863628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate.
    Ngui LX; Tang IP; Prepageran N; Lai ZW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 May; 120():184-188. PubMed ID: 30844634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of a nation-wide automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening programme in neonatal intensive care units.
    van Straaten HL; Hille ET; Kok JH; Verkerk PH;
    Acta Paediatr; 2003; 92(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 12725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early detection of neonatal hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response over 10 years of experience.
    Escobar-Ipuz FA; Soria-Bretones C; García-Jiménez MA; Cueto EM; Torres Aranda AM; Sotos JM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109647. PubMed ID: 31470205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neonatal hearing screening of high-risk infants using automated auditory brainstem response: a retrospective analysis of referral rates.
    McGurgan IJ; Patil N
    Ir J Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 183(3):405-10. PubMed ID: 24097063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
    Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results of a 10-year hearing screening using automated auditory brainstem response in newborns: The two-step AABR method.
    Shim J; Kim H; Kwon Y; Chang J; Park E; Im GJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 151():110947. PubMed ID: 34700296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Universal newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response: a multisite investigation.
    Stewart DL; Mehl A; Hall JW; Thomson V; Carroll M; Hamlett J
    J Perinatol; 2000 Dec; 20(8 Pt 2):S128-31. PubMed ID: 11190693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols.
    Vohr BR; Oh W; Stewart EJ; Bentkover JD; Gabbard S; Lemons J; Papile LA; Pye R
    J Pediatr; 2001 Aug; 139(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 11487750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical analysis of three newborn hearing screening protocols.
    Freitas VS; Alvarenga Kde F; Bevilacqua MC; Martinez MA; Costa OA
    Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 19838565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes with OAE and AABR screening in the first 48 h--Implications for newborn hearing screening in developing countries.
    van Dyk M; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jul; 79(7):1034-40. PubMed ID: 25921078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving universal newborn hearing screening outcomes by conducting it with thyroid screening.
    Rahimi V; Mohammadkhani G; Javadi F
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 111():111-114. PubMed ID: 29958592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Further examination of infants referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Wada T; Kubo T; Aiba T; Yamane H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2004 Oct; (554):17-25. PubMed ID: 15513505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-frequency otoacoustic emissions in universal newborn hearing screening.
    Akinpelu OV; Funnell WRJ; Daniel SJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 127():109659. PubMed ID: 31493551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.