These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37155085)

  • 21. Multisensory Integration of Native and Nonnative Speech in Bilingual and Monolingual Adults.
    Mohamed RH; Ansari N; Abdeljawad B; Valdivia C; Edwards A; Parks KMA; Rafat Y; Stevenson RA
    Multisens Res; 2024 Oct; ():1-18. PubMed ID: 39379038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of temporal synchrony not a prerequisite for multisensory integration.
    Jertberg RM; Begeer S; Geurts HM; Chakrabarti B; Van der Burg E
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4982. PubMed ID: 38424118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The unity hypothesis revisited: can the male/female incongruent McGurk effect be disrupted by familiarization and priming?
    Ma KST; Schnupp JWH
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1106562. PubMed ID: 37705948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Somatosensory contribution to audio-visual speech processing.
    Ito T; Ohashi H; Gracco VL
    Cortex; 2021 Oct; 143():195-204. PubMed ID: 34450567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Audio-visual speech processing in age-related hearing loss: Stronger integration and increased frontal lobe recruitment.
    Rosemann S; Thiel CM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():425-437. PubMed ID: 29655940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cross-modal masked repetition and semantic priming in auditory lexical decision.
    Chng KYT; Yap MJ; Goh WD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):599-608. PubMed ID: 30511230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility.
    Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A neural basis for interindividual differences in the McGurk effect, a multisensory speech illusion.
    Nath AR; Beauchamp MS
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):781-7. PubMed ID: 21787869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How prior expectations shape multisensory perception.
    Gau R; Noppeney U
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):876-886. PubMed ID: 26419391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audiovisual perception in adults with amblyopia: a study using the McGurk effect.
    Narinesingh C; Wan M; Goltz HC; Chandrakumar M; Wong AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(5):3158-64. PubMed ID: 24764068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Macaluso E; Soto-Faraco S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5691-5705. PubMed ID: 28792094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Motor Circuit and Superior Temporal Sulcus Activities Linked to Individual Differences in Multisensory Speech Perception.
    Li L; Li R; Huang X; Shen F; Wang H; Wang X; Deng C; Wang C; Yang J; Zhang L; Li J; Zou T; Chen H
    Brain Topogr; 2021 Nov; 34(6):779-792. PubMed ID: 34480635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Metacognition in the audiovisual McGurk illusion: perceptual and causal confidence.
    Meijer D; Noppeney U
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Sep; 378(1886):20220348. PubMed ID: 37545307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The noisy encoding of disparity model of the McGurk effect.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 25245268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rethinking the McGurk effect as a perceptual illusion.
    Getz LM; Toscano JC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2583-2598. PubMed ID: 33884572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audio-visual integration in noise: Influence of auditory and visual stimulus degradation on eye movements and perception of the McGurk effect.
    Stacey JE; Howard CJ; Mitra S; Stacey PC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3544-3557. PubMed ID: 32533526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Amodal processing of visual speech as revealed by priming.
    Kim J; Davis C; Krins P
    Cognition; 2004 Aug; 93(1):B39-47. PubMed ID: 15110729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multimodal integration in statistical learning: evidence from the McGurk illusion.
    Mitchel AD; Christiansen MH; Weiss DJ
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():407. PubMed ID: 24904449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type.
    Mallick DB; Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1299-307. PubMed ID: 25802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Crossmodal semantic priming by naturalistic sounds and spoken words enhances visual sensitivity.
    Chen YC; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1554-68. PubMed ID: 21688942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.