These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37156324)

  • 1. Auditory N1 and P2 attenuation in action observation: An event-related potential study considering effects of temporal predictability and individualism.
    Egan S; Ghio M; Bellebaum C
    Biol Psychol; 2023 May; 180():108575. PubMed ID: 37156324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensory Attenuation of the Auditory P2 Differentiates Self- from Partner-Produced Sounds during Joint Action.
    Bolt NK; Loehr JD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 33(11):2297-2310. PubMed ID: 34272962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reduced N1 to self-generated tones: an effect of temporal predictability?
    Lange K
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1088-95. PubMed ID: 21261634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensory attenuation prevails when controlling for temporal predictability of self- and externally generated tones.
    Klaffehn AL; Baess P; Kunde W; Pfister R
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Sep; 132():107145. PubMed ID: 31319119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensory attenuation is modulated by the contrasting effects of predictability and control.
    Harrison AW; Mannion DJ; Jack BN; Griffiths O; Hughes G; Whitford TJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118103. PubMed ID: 33957233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in mild cognitive impairment: Evidence from a temporal-spatial principal component analysis.
    Buján A; Lister JJ; O'Brien JL; Edwards JD
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13466. PubMed ID: 31420880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results].
    Milner R; Rusiniak M; Wolak T; Piatkowska-Janko E; Naumczyk P; Bogorodzki P; Senderski A; Ganc M; Skarzyński H
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 21916216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Latent inhibition mediates N1 attenuation to repeating sounds.
    Sable JJ; Low KA; Maclin EL; Fabiani M; Gratton G
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jul; 41(4):636-42. PubMed ID: 15189486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Consonant Duration on Formation of Consonant-Vowel Syllable Evoked Auditory Cortical Potentials.
    Yaralı M; Yağcıoğlu S
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Apr; 14(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 29092801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.
    Molloy K; Griffiths TD; Chait M; Lavie N
    J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(49):16046-54. PubMed ID: 26658858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of mechanical impact in action-related auditory attenuation.
    Horváth J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 14(4):1392-406. PubMed ID: 24723005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulation of P2 auditory-evoked responses by the spectral complexity of musical sounds.
    Shahin A; Roberts LE; Pantev C; Trainor LJ; Ross B
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1781-5. PubMed ID: 16237326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do video sounds interfere with auditory event-related potentials?
    McArthur GM; Bishop DV; Proudfoot M
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 May; 35(2):329-33. PubMed ID: 12834093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The auditory N1 suppression rebounds as prediction persists over time.
    Hsu YF; Hämäläinen JA; Waszak F
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():198-204. PubMed ID: 26921479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attenuation of auditory ERPs to action-sound coincidences is not explained by voluntary allocation of attention.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Mar; 50(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 23316925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pre-attentive auditory change detection for rapid auditory transient combinations: Insight from age-related processing changes.
    Volosin M; Czigler I; Horváth J
    Biol Psychol; 2021 Feb; 159():108024. PubMed ID: 33460782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Target detection in healthy 4-week old piglets from a passive two-tone auditory oddball paradigm.
    Oeur RA; Margulies SS
    BMC Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 21(1):52. PubMed ID: 33287727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. N1, P2 and T-complex of the auditory brain event-related potentials to tones with varying rise times in adults with and without dyslexia.
    Hämäläinen JA; Fosker T; Szücs D; Goswami U
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Jul; 81(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 21565226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trading of dynamic interaural time and level difference cues and its effect on the auditory motion-onset response measured with electroencephalography.
    Altmann CF; Ueda R; Bucher B; Furukawa S; Ono K; Kashino M; Mima T; Fukuyama H
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():185-194. PubMed ID: 28756239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.