143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37156603)
1. Abortion restrictions: the case for conscientious non-compliance on the part of providers.
Randall P; Mago J
J Med Ethics; 2024 Feb; 50(3):185-189. PubMed ID: 37156603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The criminalisation of women's healthcare in the post-Dobbs era: an analysis of the anti-abortion trigger law statutes.
Domanski K; Allswede M
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2023 Oct; 28(5):258-262. PubMed ID: 37590051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion Access for Women in Custody in the Wake of
Herr A
Am J Law Med; 2023 Dec; 49(4):471-492. PubMed ID: 38563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beneath the Sword of Damocles: Moral Obligations of Physicians in a Post-Dobbs Landscape.
Lyerly AD; Faden RR; Mello MM
Hastings Cent Rep; 2024 May; 54(3):15-27. PubMed ID: 38842894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An obligation to provide abortion services: what happens when physicians refuse?
Meyers C; Woods RD
J Med Ethics; 1996 Apr; 22(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 8731539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.
Zhu DT; Zhao L; Alzoubi T; Shenin N; Baskaran T; Tikhonov J; Wang C
PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0288947. PubMed ID: 38551970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential Effects of
Hall TS
Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):359-373. PubMed ID: 38344784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
Reingold RB; Gostin LO; Goodwin MB
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1695-1696. PubMed ID: 36318123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.
Qato DM; Myerson R; Shooshtari A; Guadamuz JS; Alexander GC
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2418620. PubMed ID: 38922616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The state of abortion rights in the US.
Davis MF
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After
Ahmed A; Huberfeld N; McClain LC
J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 38088627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. US Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Perceived Impacts of Post-Dobbs v Jackson State Abortion Bans.
Sabbath EL; McKetchnie SM; Arora KS; Buchbinder M
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jan; 7(1):e2352109. PubMed ID: 38231510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
Denniston L
Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of
Giubilini A; Schuklenk U; Minerva F; Savulescu J
J Med Ethics; 2024 May; 50(5):351-358. PubMed ID: 36754610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America.
Goodwin G; Marra E; Ramdin C; Alexander AB; Ye PP; Nelson LS; Mazer-Amirshahi M
Am J Emerg Med; 2023 Aug; 70():90-95. PubMed ID: 37245403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Balance of Rights: The Italian Way to the Abortion Controversy.
Reichlin M; Lavazza A
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):368-377. PubMed ID: 36683584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Case of Restrictions on Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care.
Easter SR; Johnson CT
NEJM Evid; 2023 Jan; 2(1):EVIDe2200294. PubMed ID: 38320058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
