These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37156900)

  • 21. A comparison of 4D flow MRI-derived wall shear stress with computational fluid dynamics methods for intracranial aneurysms and carotid bifurcations - A review.
    Szajer J; Ho-Shon K
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 48():62-69. PubMed ID: 29223732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Hemodynamic Visualization in Cerebral Arteries: Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Replace Computational Fluid Dynamics?
    Ngo MT; Lee UY; Ha H; Jin N; Chung GH; Kwak YG; Jung J; Kwak HS
    J Pers Med; 2021 Mar; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33808514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of Spatial Resolution and Compressed SENSE Acceleration Factor on Flow Quantification with 4D Flow MRI at 3 Tesla.
    Pravdivtseva MS; Gaidzik F; Berg P; Ulloa P; Larsen N; Jansen O; Hövener JB; Salehi Ravesh M
    Tomography; 2022 Feb; 8(1):457-478. PubMed ID: 35202203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving Blood Flow Visualization of Recirculation Regions at Carotid Bulb in 4D Flow MRI Using Semi-Automatic Segmentation with ITK-SNAP.
    Ngo MT; Lee UY; Ha H; Jung J; Lee DH; Kwak HS
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34679588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inflow Hemodynamics of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics and 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Misaki K; Futami K; Uno T; Nambu I; Yoshikawa A; Kamide T; Nakada M
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 May; 30(5):105685. PubMed ID: 33662703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reconstruction and Validation of Arterial Geometries for Computational Fluid Dynamics Using Multiple Temporal Frames of 4D Flow-MRI Magnitude Images.
    Black SM; Maclean C; Barrientos PH; Ritos K; Kazakidi A
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2023 Oct; 14(5):655-676. PubMed ID: 37653353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Velocity Measurement in Carotid Artery: Quantitative Comparison of Time-Resolved 3D Phase-Contrast MRI and Image-based Computational Fluid Dynamics.
    Sarrami-Foroushani A; Nasr Esfahany M; Nasiraei Moghaddam A; Saligheh Rad H; Firouznia K; Shakiba M; Ghanaati H; Wilkinson ID; Frangi AF
    Iran J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 12(4):e18286. PubMed ID: 26793288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hemodynamic Study of a Patient-Specific Intracranial Aneurysm: Comparative Assessment of Tomographic PIV, Stereoscopic PIV, In Vivo MRI and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
    Wu X; Gürzing S; Schinkel C; Toussaint M; Perinajová R; van Ooij P; Kenjereš S
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2022 Jun; 13(3):428-442. PubMed ID: 34750782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and image-based computational fluid dynamics for quantification of pulsatile flow in a carotid bifurcation phantom.
    Zhao SZ; Papathanasopoulou P; Long Q; Marshall I; Xu XY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 31(8):962-71. PubMed ID: 12918911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Regional assessment of carotid artery pulse wave velocity using compressed sensing accelerated high temporal resolution 2D CINE phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Peper ES; Strijkers GJ; Gazzola K; Potters WV; Motaal AG; Luirink IK; Hutten BA; Wiegman A; van Ooij P; van den Born BH; Nederveen AJ; Coolen BF
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Dec; 20(1):86. PubMed ID: 30567566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Towards quantitative evaluation of wall shear stress from 4D flow imaging.
    Levilly S; Castagna M; Idier J; Bonnefoy F; Le Touzé D; Moussaoui S; Paul-Gilloteaux P; Serfaty JM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Dec; 74():232-243. PubMed ID: 32889090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of sinus size and position on hemodynamics during pulsatile flow in a carotid artery bifurcation.
    Nagargoje M; Gupta R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Aug; 192():105440. PubMed ID: 32299026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 3D phase contrast MRI: Partial volume correction for robust blood flow quantification in small intracranial vessels.
    Bouillot P; Delattre BMA; Brina O; Ouared R; Farhat M; Chnafa C; Steinman DA; Lovblad KO; Pereira VM; Vargas MI
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jan; 79(1):129-140. PubMed ID: 28244132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantitative analysis of effects of hemodynamic stress on temporal variations of cardiac phases in models of human carotid bulbs.
    Saho T; Onishi H
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Dec; 10(4):475-482. PubMed ID: 28887805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Wall shear stress distribution at the carotid bifurcation: influence of eversion carotid endarterectomy.
    Harloff A; Berg S; Barker AJ; Schöllhorn J; Schumacher M; Weiller C; Markl M
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Dec; 23(12):3361-9. PubMed ID: 23812310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
    Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
    Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In-vitro validation of 4D flow MRI measurements with an experimental pulsatile flow model.
    David A; Le Touze D; Warin-Fresse K; Paul-Gilloteaux P; Bonnefoy F; Idier J; Moussaoui S; Guerin P; Serfaty JM
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Jan; 100(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 30241970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of flow and hemodynamics in the carotid artery using a reduced TE 4D flow spiral phase-contrast MRI.
    Kadbi M; Negahdar M; Traughber M; Martin P; Amini AA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1100-3. PubMed ID: 24109884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI.
    Rispoli VC; Nielsen JF; Nayak KS; Carvalho JL
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Nov; 14():110. PubMed ID: 26611470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The hemodynamic and geometric characteristics of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaque formation.
    Han N; Wang J; Ma Y; Ma L; Zheng Y; Fan F; Wu C; Yue S; Li J; Liang J; Zhang H; Zhou Y; Yang T; Zhang J
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Jul; 14(7):4348-4361. PubMed ID: 39022224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.