These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37159939)

  • 21. Hazard and risk assessment of industrial chemicals in the occupational context in Europe: some current issues.
    Fairhurst S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2003 Nov; 41(11):1453-62. PubMed ID: 12962997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Issues in consumer exposure modeling: towards harmonization on a global scale.
    Kephalopoulos S; Bruinen de Bruin Y; Arvanitis A; Hakkinen P; Jantunen M
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 1():S90-100. PubMed ID: 17668010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Testing the performance of one and two box models as tools for risk assessment of particle exposure during packing of inorganic fertilizer.
    Ribalta C; Koivisto AJ; López-Lilao A; Estupiñá S; Minguillón MC; Monfort E; Viana M
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 650(Pt 2):2423-2436. PubMed ID: 30292998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Health protection of a worker exposed to chemical agents in the work environment - biological monitoring in health risk assessment: legal regulations].
    Gregorczyk R; Janasik B; Smuga J
    Med Pr; 2022 Sep; 73(4):349-356. PubMed ID: 35997387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Risk assessment and management of occupational exposure to pesticides in agriculture.
    Maroni M; Fanetti AC; Metruccio F
    Med Lav; 2006; 97(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 17017381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Olefins and chemical regulation in Europe: REACH.
    Penman M; Banton M; Erler S; Moore N; Semmler K
    Chem Biol Interact; 2015 Nov; 241():59-65. PubMed ID: 25861726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of worker inhalation derived no effect levels for tungsten compounds.
    Jackson M; Lemus-Olalde R; Inhof C; Venezia C; Pardus M
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2013; 16(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 23682648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Alternative test methods in inhalation toxicology: challenges and opportunities.
    Costa DL
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):105-9. PubMed ID: 18486462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling potential occupational inhalation exposures and associated risks of toxic organics from chemical storage tanks used in hydraulic fracturing using AERMOD.
    Chen H; Carter KE
    Environ Pollut; 2017 May; 224():300-309. PubMed ID: 28238366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Dangerous chemical substances--tools supporting occupational risk assessment].
    Dobrzyńska E; Pośniak M
    Med Pr; 2014; 65(5):683-92. PubMed ID: 25812397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. European aspects of standard setting in occupational hygiene and medicine.
    Thier R; Bolt HM
    Rev Environ Health; 2001; 16(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 11512630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The European Union's REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements.
    Williams ES; Panko J; Paustenbach DJ
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2009; 39(7):553-75. PubMed ID: 19650717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Study of the Validity of Two Exposure Assessment Tools: Stoffenmanager and the Advanced REACH Tool.
    Landberg HE; Axmon A; Westberg H; Tinnerberg H
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Jun; 61(5):575-588. PubMed ID: 28355454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of REACH Generic Exposure Scenarios for Substances Used as Coformulants in Plant Protection Products.
    Dobe C; Bonifay S; Fliege R; Krass J; Mostert V; Vosswinkel R; Wormuth M
    Risk Anal; 2017 May; 37(5):930-942. PubMed ID: 27411735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Will worker DNELs derived under the European REACH regulation extend the landscape of occupational exposure guidance values?
    Schenk L; Johanson G
    Arch Toxicol; 2019 May; 93(5):1187-1200. PubMed ID: 30993379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Predictive models for the assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals: a new challenge for employers].
    Gromiec JP; Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Jankowska A; Czerczak S
    Med Pr; 2013; 64(5):699-716. PubMed ID: 24502133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An approach for the delineation of a generic cut-off value for local respiratory tract irritation by irritating or corrosive substances as a pragmatic tool to fulfill REACH requirements.
    Messinger H
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 68(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24486623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensitivity analysis, dominant factors, and robustness of the ECETOC TRA v3, Stoffenmanager 4.5, and ART 1.5 occupational exposure models.
    Riedmann RA; Gasic B; Vernez D
    Risk Anal; 2015 Feb; 35(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 25616198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Occupational Exposure? Review and Discussion of Models' Reliability.
    Spinazzè A; Borghi F; Campagnolo D; Rovelli S; Keller M; Fanti G; Cattaneo A; Cavallo DM
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(15):. PubMed ID: 31382456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating the Risk Assessment Approach of the REACH Legislation: A Case Study.
    Landberg HE; Hedmer M; Westberg H; Tinnerberg H
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Jan; 63(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 30371750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.