155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37160106)
21. Modeling deep brain stimulation: point source approximation versus realistic representation of the electrode.
Zhang TC; Grill WM
J Neural Eng; 2010 Dec; 7(6):066009. PubMed ID: 21084730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target.
Dmochowski JP; Datta A; Bikson M; Su Y; Parra LC
J Neural Eng; 2011 Aug; 8(4):046011. PubMed ID: 21659696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Safety of externally stimulated intracranial electrodes during functional MRI at 1.5T.
Bhattacharyya PK; Mullin J; Lee BS; Gonzalez-Martinez JA; Jones SE
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 38():182-188. PubMed ID: 28104438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dimensional scaling of thin-film stimulation electrode systems in translational research.
Schiavone G; Vachicouras N; Vyza Y; Lacour SP
J Neural Eng; 2021 May; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33831857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation.
Butson CR; Maks CB; McIntyre CC
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 16376143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of local electric fields generated by transcranial direct current stimulation with an extracephalic reference electrode based on realistic 3D body modeling.
Im CH; Park JH; Shim M; Chang WH; Kim YH
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(8):2137-50. PubMed ID: 22452936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Modeling implanted metals in electrical stimulation applications.
Mercadal B; Salvador R; Biagi MC; Bartolomei F; Wendling F; Ruffini G
J Neural Eng; 2022 Mar; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35172293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the electric field in the brain during transcranial direct current stimulation: A sensitivity analysis.
Santos L; Martinho M; Salvador R; Wenger C; Fernandes SR; Ripolles O; Ruffini G; Miranda PC
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1778-1781. PubMed ID: 28268672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computational study on subdural cortical stimulation - the influence of the head geometry, anisotropic conductivity, and electrode configuration.
Kim D; Seo H; Kim HI; Jun SC
PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108028. PubMed ID: 25229673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Finite element analysis of the current-density and electric field generated by metal microelectrodes.
McIntyre CC; Grill WM
Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 Mar; 29(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 11310784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contemporaneous evaluation of patient experience, surgical strategy, and seizure outcomes in patients undergoing stereoelectroencephalography or subdural electrode monitoring.
Kim LH; Parker JJ; Ho AL; Feng AY; Kumar KK; Chen KS; Ojukwu DI; Shuer LM; Grant GA; Graber KD; Halpern CH
Epilepsia; 2021 Jan; 62(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 33236777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influences of interpolation error, electrode geometry, and the electrode-tissue interface on models of electric fields produced by deep brain stimulation.
Howell B; Naik S; Grill WM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Feb; 61(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 24448594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: a finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field.
Sun W; Dong X; Yu G; Shuai L; Yuan Y; Ma C
J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520942112. PubMed ID: 33788619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Finite element analysis of electric field of extracellular stimulation of optic nerve with a spiral cuff electrode].
Guo H; Qiao Q; Luo F
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 29(5):820-4. PubMed ID: 23198414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Recording human electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for neuroscientific research and real-time functional cortical mapping.
Hill NJ; Gupta D; Brunner P; Gunduz A; Adamo MA; Ritaccio A; Schalk G
J Vis Exp; 2012 Jun; (64):. PubMed ID: 22782131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electrode and brain modeling in stereo-EEG.
von Ellenrieder N; Beltrachini L; Muravchik CH
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Sep; 123(9):1745-54. PubMed ID: 22364724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. EView: An electric field visualization web platform for electroporation-based therapies.
Perera-Bel E; Yagüe C; Mercadal B; Ceresa M; Beitel-White N; Davalos RV; Ballester MAG; Ivorra A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105682. PubMed ID: 32795723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. IntrAnat Electrodes: A Free Database and Visualization Software for Intracranial Electroencephalographic Data Processed for Case and Group Studies.
Deman P; Bhattacharjee M; Tadel F; Job AS; Rivière D; Cointepas Y; Kahane P; David O
Front Neuroinform; 2018; 12():40. PubMed ID: 30034332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Alternating Electric Fields Modify the Function of Human Osteoblasts Growing on and in the Surroundings of Titanium Electrodes.
Sahm F; Ziebart J; Jonitz-Heincke A; Hansmann D; Dauben T; Bader R
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Sep; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 32971771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimized APPS-tDCS electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target stimulation magnitude in 3000 electric field models.
Caulfield KA; George MS
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20116. PubMed ID: 36418438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
