These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37160168)

  • 1. Determining minimal clinically important difference estimates following surgery for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: analysis of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry.
    Power JD; Perruccio AV; Canizares M; McIntosh G; Abraham E; Attabib N; Bailey CS; Charest-Morin R; Dea N; Finkelstein J; Fisher C; Glennie RA; Hall H; Johnson MG; Kelly AM; Kingwell S; Manson N; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Singh S; Soroceanu A; Thomas KC; Weber MH; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2023 Sep; 23(9):1323-1333. PubMed ID: 37160168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimal clinically important difference in patients who underwent decompression alone for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Nakarai H; Kato S; Kawamura N; Higashikawa A; Takeshita Y; Fukushima M; Ono T; Hara N; Azuma S; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):549-560. PubMed ID: 34699996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring clinically relevant improvement after lumbar spine surgery: is it time for something new?
    Asher AM; Oleisky ER; Pennings JS; Khan I; Sivaganesan A; Devin CJ; Bydon M; Asher AL; Archer KR
    Spine J; 2020 Jun; 20(6):847-856. PubMed ID: 32001385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.
    Asher AL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Speroff T; Harrell FE; Nian H; Dittus RS; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Glassman SD; Bydon M; Archer KR; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 26989974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of preoperative symptom duration on outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry study.
    Cushnie D; Thomas K; Jacobs WB; Cho RKH; Soroceanu A; Ahn H; Attabib N; Bailey CS; Fisher CG; Glennie RA; Hall H; Jarzem P; Johnson MG; Manson NA; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Rampersaud YR; Phan P; Casha S
    Spine J; 2019 Sep; 19(9):1470-1477. PubMed ID: 31121258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differentiation of pain-related functional limitations in surgical patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using the Oswestry Disability Index: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) study.
    Charalampidis A; Canizares M; Kalsi PS; Hung Wu P; Johnson M; Soroceanu A; Nataraj A; Glennie A; Rasoulinejad P; Attabib N; Hall H; Fisher C; Thomas K; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):578-586. PubMed ID: 34699999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective national spine registry observational study.
    Alhaug OK; Dolatowski FC; Solberg TK; Lønne G
    Spine J; 2021 Sep; 21(9):1489-1496. PubMed ID: 33848690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions?
    Hung M; Saltzman CL; Kendall R; Bounsanga J; Voss MW; Lawrence B; Spiker R; Brodke D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2027-2036. PubMed ID: 30179950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results.
    Song J; Araghi K; Dupont MM; Shahi P; Bovonratwet P; Shinn D; Dalal SS; Melissaridou D; Virk SS; Iyer S; Dowdell JE; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1677-1686. PubMed ID: 35671940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
    Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Werner DAT; Grotle M; Gulati S; Austevoll IM; Lønne G; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2650-2659. PubMed ID: 28616747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
    Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Values derived from patient reported outcomes in spine surgery: a systematic review of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state.
    Issa TZ; Lee Y; Henry TW; Trenchfield D; Schroeder GD; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Oct; 32(10):3333-3351. PubMed ID: 37642774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index Should not be Utilized to Determine Surgical Eligibility for Patients Requiring Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease.
    Issa TZ; Haider AA; Lambrechts MJ; Sherman MB; Canseco JA; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD; Kepler CK; Hilibrand AS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Jul; 49(14):965-972. PubMed ID: 38420655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
    Fekete TF; Haschtmann D; Kleinstück FS; Porchet F; Jeszenszky D; Mannion AF
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 26850172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.