296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37160269)
21. Revision TKA for Instability: Poorer Outcomes after a Previous Aseptic Revision.
Tegethoff JD; Walker-Santiago R; Ralston WM; Keeney JA
J Knee Surg; 2022 Sep; 35(11):1204-1208. PubMed ID: 33485276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Do symptoms of anxiety and/or depression and pain intensity before primary Total knee arthroplasty influence reason for revision? Results of an observational study from the Dutch arthroplasty register in 56,233 patients.
Sorel JC; Oosterhoff JHF; Broekman BFP; Jaarsma RL; Doornberg JN; IJpma FFA; Jutte PC; Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Gademan MGJ; Poolman RW
Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 2022; 78():42-49. PubMed ID: 35853417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis.
Verra WC; van den Boom LG; Jacobs W; Clement DJ; Wymenga AA; Nelissen RG
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD004803. PubMed ID: 24114343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Revision Rates and Functional Outcomes Among Severely, Morbidly, and Super-Obese Patients Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chaudhry H; Ponnusamy K; Somerville L; McCalden RW; Marsh J; Vasarhelyi EM
JBJS Rev; 2019 Jul; 7(7):e9. PubMed ID: 31365448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Periprosthetic Infection: Major Cause of Early Failure of Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Evangelopoulos DS; Ahmad SS; Krismer AM; Albers CE; Hoppe S; Kleer B; Kohl S; Ateschrang A
J Knee Surg; 2019 Oct; 32(10):941-946. PubMed ID: 30336501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reasons for revision are associated with rerevised total knee arthroplasties: an analysis of 8,978 index revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
Belt M; Hannink G; Smolders J; Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Schreurs BW; Smulders K
Acta Orthop; 2021 Oct; 92(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 33988078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is comparable to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Onggo JR; Onggo JD; De Steiger R; Hau R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Oct; 140(10):1533-1549. PubMed ID: 32537660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Peng G; Liu M; Guan Z; Hou Y; Liu Q; Sun X; Zhu X; Feng W; Zeng J; Zhong Z; Zeng Y
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Apr; 16(1):264. PubMed ID: 33858458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Financial analysis of revision knee surgery at a tertiary referral centre as classified according to the Revision Knee Complexity Classification (RKCC).
Petrie MJ; Harrison TP; Salih S; Gordon A; Hamer AJ; Buckley SC; Kerry RM
Knee; 2021 Mar; 29():469-477. PubMed ID: 33744694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization.
Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Khatod M; Yue E; Funahashi T; Barber T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3965-73. PubMed ID: 26324831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. RSA-tested TKA Implants on Average Have Lower Mean 10-year Revision Rates Than Non-RSA-tested Designs.
Hasan S; Marang-van de Mheen PJ; Kaptein BL; Nelissen RGHH; Pijls BG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1232-1241. PubMed ID: 32187101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Effect of Joint Line Elevation on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Contemporary Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Buller LT; Metzger CM; Deckard ER; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6):1146-1152. PubMed ID: 35202760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Single-Stage Revision of the Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Improved Functional Outcomes: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.
Klemt C; Tirumala V; Oganesyan R; Xiong L; van den Kieboom J; Kwon YM
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):298-304. PubMed ID: 32778418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Index surgery and ninety day re-operation cost comparison of robotic-assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty.
Ezeokoli EU; John J; Gupta R; Jawad A; Cavinatto L
Int Orthop; 2023 Feb; 47(2):359-364. PubMed ID: 36574020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have similar patient-reported outcome measures in a two-year follow-up study.
Lim JBT; Chong HC; Pang HN; Tay KJD; Chia SL; Lo NN; Yeo SJ
Bone Joint J; 2017 Oct; 99-B(10):1329-1334. PubMed ID: 28963154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Verasense sensor-assisted total knee arthroplasty showed no difference in range of motion, reoperation rate or functional outcomes when compared to manually balanced total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Sava MP; Hara H; Alexandra L; Hügli RW; Hirschmann MT
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 May; 31(5):1851-1858. PubMed ID: 36854996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
