123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37160472)
1. PI-RADS 3 lesions: a critical review and discussion of how to improve management.
Nicola R; Bittencourt LK
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Jul; 48(7):2401-2405. PubMed ID: 37160472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Follow-up of Patients Included in Active Surveillance Protocol. Can PSA Density Discriminate Patients at Different Risk of Reclassification?
Roscigno M; Stabile A; Lughezzani G; Pepe P; Galosi AB; Naselli A; Naspro R; Nicolai M; La Croce G; Aljoulani M; Perugini G; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Balzarini L; Sironi S; Da Pozzo LF
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Dec; 18(6):e698-e704. PubMed ID: 32493676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PSA density is complementary to prostate MP-MRI PI-RADS scoring system for risk stratification of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Frisbie JW; Van Besien AJ; Lee A; Xu L; Wang S; Choksi A; Afzal MA; Naslund MJ; Lane B; Wong J; Wnorowski A; Siddiqui MM
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Jun; 26(2):347-352. PubMed ID: 35523940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate-specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Multicenter Evaluation.
Chiu PK; Leow JJ; Chiang CH; Mok A; Zhang K; Hsieh PF; Zhu Y; Lam W; Tsang WC; Fan YH; Lin TP; Chan TY; Leung CH; Teoh JY; Chu PS; Zhu G; Ye DW; Wu HC; Tan TW; Tsu JH; Ng CF; Chiong E; Huang CY
J Urol; 2023 Jul; 210(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 37036248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer.
Wei X; Xu J; Zhong S; Zou J; Cheng Z; Ding Z; Zhou X
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Oct; 47(10):3574-3582. PubMed ID: 35788882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to stratify biopsy-naïve men for an optimum diagnostic strategy with prostate-specific antigen 4 ng ml
Zhang CC; Tu X; Lin TH; Cai DM; Yang L; Qiu S; Liu ZH; Yang L; Wei Q
Asian J Androl; 2023; 25(4):492-498. PubMed ID: 36571328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unified model involving genomics, magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density outperforms individual co-variables at predicting biopsy upgrading in patients on active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.
Beksac AT; Ratnani P; Dovey Z; Parekh S; Falagario U; Roshandel R; Sobotka S; Kewlani D; Davis A; Weil R; Bashorun H; Jambor I; Lewis S; Haines K; Tewari AK
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Mar; 5(3):e1492. PubMed ID: 34931468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Role of PSA Density among PI-RADS v2.1 Categories to Avoid an Unnecessary Transition Zone Biopsy in Patients with PSA 4-20 ng/mL.
Wang ZB; Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Dai GC; Tu J; Shen JK
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():3995789. PubMed ID: 34671673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Strategy to Avoid Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies.
Görtz M; Radtke JP; Hatiboglu G; Schütz V; Tosev G; Güttlein M; Leichsenring J; Stenzinger A; Bonekamp D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Nyarangi-Dix JN
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):325-331. PubMed ID: 31839564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).
Falagario UG; Jambor I; Lantz A; Ettala O; Stabile A; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Perez IM; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Picker W; Haug E; Ratnani P; Haines K; Lewis S; Sujit N; Selvaggio O; Sanguedolce F; Macarini L; Cormio L; Nordström T; Tewari A; Briganti A; Boström PJ; Carrieri G
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):971-979. PubMed ID: 32972896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utilizing lesion diameter and prostate specific antigen density to decide on magnetic resonance imaging guided confirmatory biopsy of prostate imaging reporting and data system score three lesions in African American prostate cancer patients managed with active surveillance.
Alanee S; Deebajah M; Dabaja A; Peabody J; Menon M
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Apr; 54(4):799-803. PubMed ID: 35138582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI.
Girometti R; Giannarini G; Panebianco V; Maresca S; Cereser L; De Martino M; Pizzolitto S; Pecoraro M; Ficarra V; Zuiani C; Valotto C
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210886. PubMed ID: 34762506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinico-radiological characteristic-based machine learning in reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies of PI-RADS 3 lesions with dual validation.
Kan Y; Zhang Q; Hao J; Wang W; Zhuang J; Gao J; Huang H; Liang J; Marra G; Calleris G; Oderda M; Zhao X; Gontero P; Guo H
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6274-6284. PubMed ID: 32524222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of PSA density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions on bpMRI for biopsies.
Kortenbach KC; Løgager V; Thomsen HS; Boesen L
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Feb; 48(2):688-693. PubMed ID: 36318331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate imaging-reporting and data system version 2 in combination with clinical parameters for prostate cancer detection: a single center experience.
Wang L; Luo Y; Liu T; Deng M; Huang X
Int Urol Nephrol; 2023 Jul; 55(7):1659-1664. PubMed ID: 37171702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiparametric MRI prostate PI-RAD scoring in a district general hospital: correlating PI-RADS 3 results with histological findings.
Aslam S; Tsang J; Bickle I; Saiepour A
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210804. PubMed ID: 34919444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application of dynamic contrast enhanced status in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer with PI-RADS 4 lesion].
Yuan CW; Li R; Li ZH; Liu Y; Shan GZ; Li XS; Zhou LQ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Oct; 55(5):838-842. PubMed ID: 37807737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions: A High-volume International Multicenter Study.
Sigle A; Borkowetz A; von Hardenberg J; Drerup M; Kornienko K; Kwe J; Wenzel M; Mandel P; Westhoff N; Rieger C; Hoffmann MA; Ortner G; Mahjoub S;
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):606-613. PubMed ID: 36804191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization?
Messina E; Pecoraro M; Laschena L; Bicchetti M; Proietti F; Ciardi A; Leonardo C; Sciarra A; Girometti R; Catalano C; Panebianco V
Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5828-5839. PubMed ID: 37045981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
