These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37161352)

  • 1. Contextual Lateralization Based on Interaural Level Differences Is Preshaped by the Auditory Periphery and Predominantly Immune Against Sequential Segregation.
    Laback B
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231171988. PubMed ID: 37161352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of dynamic-range compression on the spatial attributes of sounds in normal-hearing listeners.
    Wiggins IM; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):399-410. PubMed ID: 22246139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
    Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateralization of Interaural Level Differences with Multiple Electrode Stimulation in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Stakhovskaya OA; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e22-e38. PubMed ID: 27579987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Across-channel interaural-level-difference processing demonstrates frequency dependence.
    Goupell MJ; Stakhovskaya OA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):645. PubMed ID: 29495743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source.
    Carcagno S; Semal C; Demany L
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 22766695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex?
    Altmann CF; Terada S; Kashino M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Furukawa S
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():121-7. PubMed ID: 24709274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual and Electrophysiological Correlates of Fixed Versus Moving Sound Source Lateralization.
    St George BV; Cone B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 63(9):3176-3194. PubMed ID: 32812839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuronal interaural level difference response shifts are level-dependent in the rat auditory cortex.
    Kyweriga M; Stewart W; Wehr M
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Mar; 111(5):930-8. PubMed ID: 24335208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the precision of neural computation with interaural level differences in the lateral superior olive.
    Bures Z; Marsalek P
    Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1536():16-26. PubMed ID: 23684714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal effects in interaural and sequential level difference perception.
    Laback B; Dietz M; Joris P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3267. PubMed ID: 29195428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Slow Temporal Integration Enables Robust Neural Coding and Perception of a Cue to Sound Source Location.
    Brown AD; Tollin DJ
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9908-21. PubMed ID: 27656028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human medial olivocochlear reflex: effects as functions of contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitor bandwidths.
    Lilaonitkul W; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 10(3):459-70. PubMed ID: 19263165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural processing by the gecko auditory periphery.
    Christensen-Dalsgaard J; Tang Y; Carr CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 May; 105(5):1992-2004. PubMed ID: 21325679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.
    Higgins NC; McLaughlin SA; Rinne T; Stecker GC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):E7602-E7611. PubMed ID: 28827357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory tuning for spatial cues in the barn owl basal ganglia.
    Cohen YE; Knudsen EI
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Jul; 72(1):285-98. PubMed ID: 7965012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linear coding of complex sound spectra by discharge rate in neurons of the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MNTB) and its inputs.
    Koka K; Tollin DJ
    Front Neural Circuits; 2014; 8():144. PubMed ID: 25565971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.