170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37161372)
1. Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors.
Ye Y; Li Z; Kang S; Yang Y; Ling B; Wang L; Yao J; Li P; Wang X; Gong S; Fan H; Kong Y; Cao Y; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
BMC Cancer; 2023 May; 23(1):421. PubMed ID: 37161372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study.
Li Z; Duan H; Guo J; Yang Y; Wang W; Hao M; Li W; Li P; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):122. PubMed ID: 35282078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial treatment for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer based on histological type: A 14-year multicenter study.
Ye Y; Zhang G; Li Z; Chen B; Zhao H; Yang Y; Wang L; Yao J; Chen X; Huang Y; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Cancer Med; 2023 Oct; 12(19):19617-19632. PubMed ID: 37768092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Alone for Oncological Outcomes of Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer-A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Li W; Zhang W; Sun L; Wang L; Cui Z; Zhao H; Wang D; Zhang Y; Guo J; Yang Y; Wang W; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():730753. PubMed ID: 34589433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.
Li P; Zhan X; Lv C; Lin Z; Yang Y; Wang W; Wang S; Hao M; Zhu B; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():879569. PubMed ID: 35847917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy.
Li Z; Yang Q; Guo J; Liang G; Duan H; Wang S; Hao M; Liang W; Li D; Zhan X; Xie Q; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():933755. PubMed ID: 35875125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer.
Li P; Liu P; Yang Y; Wang L; Liu J; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1002. PubMed ID: 32733796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy compared with radical surgery alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced-stage cervical cancer.
Yin M; Zhao F; Lou G; Zhang H; Sun M; Li C; Hou Y; Li X; Meng F; Chen X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jan; 21(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 21330834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018).
Chen X; Liang W; Duan H; Wu M; Zhan X; Dai E; Lv Q; Xie Q; Liu R; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():800049. PubMed ID: 35494051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy and radiochemotherapy IIA2 (FIGO2018) cervical cancer: a retrospective study from a large database of 63,926 cases of cervical cancer in China.
He J; Li D; Shen P; Liang W; Kang S; Zhang Y; Zhao H; Liu M; Wang X; Lin Z; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Int J Clin Oncol; 2022 Mar; 27(3):619-625. PubMed ID: 34837596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rationality of FIGO 2018 IIIC restaging of cervical cancer according to local tumor size: A cohort study.
Duan H; Li H; Kang S; Zhao H; Chen B; Wang L; Li P; Wang Y; Wang W; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Aug; 102(8):1045-1052. PubMed ID: 37338046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen C; Fang Z; Wang Q; Li W; Li P; Wang L; Kang S; Zhu B; Lin Z; Wang X; Wang L; Fan H; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):346-352. PubMed ID: 32859433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic vs. Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
Wang W; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1331. PubMed ID: 31828044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Bulky-Size Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis between the Robotic and Abdominal Approaches.
Liu CH; Lee YC; Lin JC; Chan IS; Lee NR; Chang WH; Liu WM; Wang PH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31614465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of survival outcomes between radio-chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy with postoperative standard therapy in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: long-term oncological outcome analysis in 37 Chinese hospitals.
Liu P; Lin L; Kong Y; Huo Z; Zhu L; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
BMC Cancer; 2020 Mar; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 32138718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and abdominal surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
Chen C; Guo J; Liu P; Li Z; Jiang H; Zhu Q; Bin X; Lang J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1516-1526. PubMed ID: 33527615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Lu A; Zhao H; Zhan X; Duan H; Li P; Zhao W; Yao J; Li D; Jiang H; Liu M; Bin X; Lang J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Feb; 305(2):449-458. PubMed ID: 34406459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
