BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37162802)

  • 1. Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy.
    Nakamura J; Kamao T; Mitani A; Mizuki N; Shiraishi A
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():1277-1285. PubMed ID: 37162802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of digital subtraction dacryocystography and dacryoendoscopy in patients with epiphora.
    Bae SH; Park J; Lee JK
    Eye (Lond); 2021 Mar; 35(3):877-882. PubMed ID: 32467631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft stop on syringing and probing may have a high false-positive rate in diagnosing pre-sac obstruction.
    Usmani E; Shapira Y; Macri C; Davis G; Selva D
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 43(4):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 36103103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Comparison of CT-DCG and dacryoendoscopy in accurately localizing the lacrimal drainage obstructions.
    Zhang W; Li L; Zhang L; Ding Y; Liu X; Ali MJ; Xiao C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; ():11206721241230581. PubMed ID: 38327083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Syringing has limited reliability in differentiating nasolacrimal duct stenosis from functional delay.
    Shapira Y; Juniat V; Macri C; Selva D
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 260(9):3037-3042. PubMed ID: 35460361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Dacryocystography (CBCT DCG) for the Evaluation of Lacrimal Drainage System Dysfunction.
    Karlin JN; Mustak H; Gupta A; Ramos R; Rootman DB
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020; 36(6):549-552. PubMed ID: 32251183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital subtraction dacryocystography and syringing in the management of epiphora.
    Saleh GM; Gauba V; Tsangaris P; Tharmaseelan K
    Orbit; 2007 Dec; 26(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18097962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dacryocystography using cone beam CT in patients with lacrimal drainage system obstruction.
    Tschopp M; Bornstein MM; Sendi P; Jacobs R; Goldblum D
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014; 30(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 24833449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interobserver agreement on interpretation of conventional dacryocystography and dacryoscintigraphy findings: A retrospective single-centre study.
    Sia PI; Curragh D; Howell S; Selva D
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 47(6):713-717. PubMed ID: 30866143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of dacryocystography in the management of patients with epiphora.
    Nixon J; Birchall IW; Virjee J
    Br J Radiol; 1990 May; 63(749):337-9. PubMed ID: 2379059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Low-dose helical CT-dacryocystography in nasolacrimal duct obstruction-a prospective study].
    Reichel O; Gora F; Dittrich M; Kugler V
    HNO; 2019 Aug; 67(8):600-605. PubMed ID: 31053940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dacryocystography: From theory to current practice.
    Singh S; Ali MJ; Paulsen F
    Ann Anat; 2019 Jul; 224():33-40. PubMed ID: 30954539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-contrast MR dacryocystography for the evaluation of epiphora and recurrent dacryocystitis: A preliminary study.
    Cè M; Grimaldi E; Toto-Brocchi M; Martinenghi C; Oliva G; Felisaz PF; Schiavo P; Lunardi G; Cellina M
    Neuroradiol J; 2023 Aug; 36(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 36404757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diversity in Lacrimal Pathway Morphology Among Patients with Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
    Nakamura J; Ohno T; Mizuki Y; Takeuchi M; Mizuki N; Matsumura N
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2024; 18():1861-1869. PubMed ID: 38948345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The surgical outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy according to the obstruction levels of lacrimal drainage system.
    Choi JC; Jin HR; Moon YE; Kim MS; Oh JK; Kim HA; Choi MY; Shim WS
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 2(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 19784407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lacrimal imaging findings in fellow asymptomatic eyes of unilateral epiphora.
    Macri C; Shapira Y; Selva D
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):3328-3332. PubMed ID: 35261267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic MR dacryocystography in patients with epiphora.
    Cubuk R; Tasali N; Aydin S; Saydam B; Sengor T
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 19062211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reference role of middle turbinate axilla in lacrimal sac localization assisted by computed tomographic dacryocystography-reference value of middle turbinate in locating lacrimal sac.
    Yang L; Li H; Yin Z; Zhang L; Yang Z
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):500. PubMed ID: 36539768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical utility of SPECT/CT and CT-dacryocystography-enhanced dacryoscintigraphy in the imaging of lacrimal drainage system obstruction.
    Barna S; Garai I; Kukuts K; Gesztelyi R; Toth L; Kemeny-Beke A
    Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Oct; 33(10):746-754. PubMed ID: 31313247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance dacryocystography in patients with epiphora.
    Kirchhof K; Hähnel S; Jansen O; Zake S; Sartor K
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 10752902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.