These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37163757)

  • 1. Comparison of Administrative versus Electronic Health Record-based Methods for Identifying Sepsis Hospitalizations.
    Karlic KJ; Clouse TL; Hogan CK; Garland A; Seelye S; Sussman JB; Prescott HC
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2023 Sep; 20(9):1309-1315. PubMed ID: 37163757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of Sepsis in a National Cohort Using Three Different Methods to Define Baseline Organ Function.
    Wayne MT; Molling D; Wang XQ; Hogan CK; Seelye S; Liu VX; Prescott HC
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2021 Apr; 18(4):648-655. PubMed ID: 33476245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of Adult Sepsis Event and Epidemiologic Analysis of Sepsis Prevalence and Mortality Using Adult Sepsis Event's Electronic Health Records-Based Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Criteria: A Single-Center Study in South Korea.
    Lee SY; Park MH; Oh DK; Lim CM
    Crit Care Med; 2024 Aug; 52(8):1173-1182. PubMed ID: 38530078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in Identifying Sepsis and Organ Dysfunction Using Administrative Versus Electronic Clinical Data and Impact on Hospital Outcome Comparisons.
    Rhee C; Jentzsch MS; Kadri SS; Seymour CW; Angus DC; Murphy DJ; Martin GS; Dantes RB; Epstein L; Fiore AE; Jernigan JA; Danner RL; Warren DK; Septimus EJ; Hickok J; Poland RE; Jin R; Fram D; Schaaf R; Wang R; Klompas M;
    Crit Care Med; 2019 Apr; 47(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 30431493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving documentation and coding for acute organ dysfunction biases estimates of changing sepsis severity and burden: a retrospective study.
    Rhee C; Murphy MV; Li L; Platt R; Klompas M;
    Crit Care; 2015 Sep; 19(1):338. PubMed ID: 26369326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A surveillance method to identify patients with sepsis from electronic health records in Hong Kong: a single centre retrospective study.
    Liu YZ; Chu R; Lee A; Gomersall CD; Zhang L; Gin T; Chan MTV; Wu WKK; Ling L
    BMC Infect Dis; 2020 Sep; 20(1):652. PubMed ID: 32894059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis.
    Iwashyna TJ; Odden A; Rohde J; Bonham C; Kuhn L; Malani P; Chen L; Flanders S
    Med Care; 2014 Jun; 52(6):e39-43. PubMed ID: 23001437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective Sepsis Surveillance Using Electronic Clinical Data.
    Rhee C; Kadri S; Huang SS; Murphy MV; Li L; Platt R; Klompas M
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 26526737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Automated Sepsis Identification Methods and Electronic Health Record-based Sepsis Phenotyping: Improving Case Identification Accuracy by Accounting for Confounding Comorbid Conditions.
    Henry KE; Hager DN; Osborn TM; Wu AW; Saria S
    Crit Care Explor; 2019 Oct; 1(10):e0053. PubMed ID: 32166234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing.
    Murff HJ; FitzHenry F; Matheny ME; Gentry N; Kotter KL; Crimin K; Dittus RS; Rosen AK; Elkin PL; Brown SH; Speroff T
    JAMA; 2011 Aug; 306(8):848-55. PubMed ID: 21862746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data.
    Valik JK; Ward L; Tanushi H; Müllersdorf K; Ternhag A; Aufwerber E; Färnert A; Johansson AF; Mogensen ML; Pickering B; Dalianis H; Henriksson A; Herasevich V; Nauclér P
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):735-745. PubMed ID: 32029574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections: Hospital-Onset Adult Sepsis Events Versus Current Reportable Conditions.
    Page B; Klompas M; Chan C; Filbin MR; Dutta S; McEvoy DS; Clark R; Leibowitz M; Rhee C
    Clin Infect Dis; 2021 Sep; 73(6):1013-1019. PubMed ID: 33780544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.
    Rhee C; Dantes R; Epstein L; Murphy DJ; Seymour CW; Iwashyna TJ; Kadri SS; Angus DC; Danner RL; Fiore AE; Jernigan JA; Martin GS; Septimus E; Warren DK; Karcz A; Chan C; Menchaca JT; Wang R; Gruber S; Klompas M;
    JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(13):1241-1249. PubMed ID: 28903154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated safety event monitoring using electronic medical records in a clinical trial setting: Validation study using the VA NEPHRON-D trial.
    Huang Y; Fried LF; Kyriakides TC; Johnson GR; Chiu S; Mcdonald L; Zhang JH
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 30445841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying severe sepsis via electronic surveillance.
    Brandt BN; Gartner AB; Moncure M; Cannon CM; Carlton E; Cleek C; Wittkopp C; Simpson SQ
    Am J Med Qual; 2015; 30(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 24970280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining the Electronic Signature of Infection in Electronic Health Record Data.
    Churpek MM; Dumanian J; Dussault N; Bhavani SV; Carey KA; Gilbert ER; Arain E; Ye C; Winslow CJ; Shah NS; Afshar M; Edelson DP
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Jul; 49(7):e673-e682. PubMed ID: 33861547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Automated Methods Versus the American Burn Association Sepsis Definition to Identify Sepsis and Sepsis With Organ Dysfunction/Septic Shock in Burn-Injured Adults.
    Rech MA; Mosier MJ; Zelisko S; Netzer G; Kovacs EJ; Afshar M
    J Burn Care Res; 2017; 38(5):312-318. PubMed ID: 28230556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategy to Identify Paramedic Transported Sepsis Cases in an Emergency Department Administrative Database.
    Lane DJ; Blanchard IE; Cheskes S; Lazarenko G; Lin S; Morrison LJ; Saskin R; Seymour CW; Wunsch H; Scales DC
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2020; 24(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 31046502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discharge diagnoses versus medical record review in the identification of community-acquired sepsis.
    Wang HE; Addis DR; Donnelly JP; Shapiro NI; Griffin RL; Safford MM; Baddley JW
    Crit Care; 2015 Feb; 19(1):42. PubMed ID: 25879803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.