164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37163932)
1. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation of teeth by conventional panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images - A cross-sectional study.
Barakaat AA; Maaz M; Sukhia RH; Fida M
Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100757. PubMed ID: 37163932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.
Bouwens DG; Cevidanes L; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 21195286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of mesiodistal tooth angulations determined through traditional panoramic radiographs and cone beam CT panoramic images].
Lei Q; Zhou L; Lei L; Wang Y
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 32(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 25241531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variation in mesiodistal root angulation of panoramic images generated from cone-beam computed tomography.
Liu SQ; Wen FJ; Chen H; Liu Y
Chin J Dent Res; 2013; 16(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 24436945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of mesiodistal root angulation projected by cone-beam computed tomographic panoramic-like images.
Van Elslande D; Heo G; Flores-Mir C; Carey J; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S94-9. PubMed ID: 20381767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The suitability of panoramic radiographs for clinical decision making regarding root angulation compared to cone-beam computed tomography.
Alqareer A; Nada R; Ghayyath A; Baghdady M; Allareddy V
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 May; 21(1):89. PubMed ID: 34030659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation between panoramic radiography and reconstructed panoramic images from cone beam computed tomography].
Liu S; Wen F; Chen H; Liu Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 49(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24697881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Mesiodistal Root Angulation Measured from Conventional and CBCT Derived Panoramic Radiographs in Orthodontic Patients.
Nasseh I; Jensen D; Noujeim M
Open Dent J; 2017; 11():338-349. PubMed ID: 28839482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images.
Tong H; Enciso R; Van Elslande D; Major PW; Sameshima GT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 22748999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mesiodistal root angulation using panoramic and cone beam CT.
Peck JL; Sameshima GT; Miller A; Worth P; Hatcher DC
Angle Orthod; 2007 Mar; 77(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 17319753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth in 3-dimensional space in patients with near-normal occlusion.
Tong H; Kwon D; Shi J; Sakai N; Enciso R; Sameshima GT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):604-17. PubMed ID: 22554755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of C-shaped canals by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography: root-type specificity by longitudinal distribution.
Sinanoglu A; Helvacioglu-Yigit D
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):917-21. PubMed ID: 24935535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of digital panoramic radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography for measuring alveolar bone.
Tang Z; Liu X; Chen K
Head Face Med; 2017 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 28228135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthopantomography
Rodríguez M; Marshall M; Godoy C; Richa R; Niklander SE
Curr Med Imaging; 2024; 20():1-7. PubMed ID: 38389337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the effect of using panoramic and cone-beam computed tomography on the accuracy of root position in indirect digital bracket placement: A retrospective study.
Yilmaz H; Eglenen MN
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Aug; 25(3):401-408. PubMed ID: 34837461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation.
Patel PS; Shah JS; Dudhia BB; Butala PB; Jani YV; Macwan RS
Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 32246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of impacted maxillary canines on root resorption of lateral incisors : A cone beam computed tomography study.
Ucar FI; Celebi AA; Tan E; Topcuoğlu T; Sekerci AE
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):233-240. PubMed ID: 28204849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the use of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the assessment of pre-eruptive intracoronal resorption.
Demirtas O; Dane A; Yildirim E
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016 Nov; 74(8):636-641. PubMed ID: 27669814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of impacted canines' localization and adjacent lateral incisors' root resorption with orthopantomography and cone-beam computed tomography.
Akkuc S; Duruk G; Duman S
Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):476-486. PubMed ID: 32949336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
