164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37163932)
21. Comparison of 2D OPG image versus orthopantomogram from 3D CBCT from the forensic point of view.
Eliasova H; Dostalova T; Prochazka A; Sediva E; Horacek M; Urbanova P; Hlinakova P
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2021 Feb; 48():101802. PubMed ID: 33478657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up.
Patel S; Wilson R; Dawood A; Foschi F; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):711-23. PubMed ID: 22775142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Correlation between panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in assessing maxillary impacted canines.
Ngo CTT; Fishman LS; Rossouw PE; Wang H; Said O
Angle Orthod; 2018 Jul; 88(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29561656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Souza PC; Willems G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):764.e1-11; discussion 764-5. PubMed ID: 19962592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of the relationships between posterior root apices and the maxillary sinus floor: a comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography.
Amani R; Noroozi M; Ashrafi MMS
Gen Dent; 2023; 71(5):58-63. PubMed ID: 37595085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery.
Hauge Matzen L; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Nov; 71(6):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23356838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Near-end of treatment panoramic radiograph in the assessment of mesiodistal root angulation.
Owens AM; Johal A
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 18416620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs.
Flores-Mir C; Rosenblatt MR; Major PW; Carey JP; Heo G
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):45-53. PubMed ID: 25715716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relationship between CBCT and panoramic images of the morphology and angulation of the posterior mandibular jaw bone.
Çiftçi ME; Aktan AM; İşman Ö; Yıldırım E
Surg Radiol Anat; 2016 Apr; 38(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 26370261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography findings in preoperative examination of impacted mandibular third molars.
Peker I; Sarikir C; Alkurt MT; Zor ZF
BMC Oral Health; 2014 Jun; 14():71. PubMed ID: 24928108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing third molar root development staging in panoramic radiography, extracted teeth, and cone beam computed tomography.
Franco A; Vetter F; Coimbra EF; Fernandes Â; Thevissen P
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):347-353. PubMed ID: 31754774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dental long axes using digital dental models compared to cone-beam computed tomography.
Cong A; Massaro C; Ruellas ACO; Barkley M; Yatabe M; Bianchi J; Ioshida M; Alvarez MA; Aristizabal JF; Rey D; Cevidanes L
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 33966340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is Panoramic Radiography an Accurate Imaging Technique for the Detection of Endodontically Treated Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis?
Nardi C; Calistri L; Grazzini G; Desideri I; Lorini C; Occhipinti M; Mungai F; Colagrande S
J Endod; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1500-1508. PubMed ID: 30154006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and two-dimensional imaging methods in the 3D localization and assessment of maxillary impacted canines compared to the gold standard in-vivo readings: A cross-sectional study.
Alfailany DT; Shaweesh AI; Hajeer MY; Brad B; Alhaffar JB
Int Orthod; 2023 Sep; 21(3):100780. PubMed ID: 37290351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographs.
Garcia-Figueroa MA; Raboud DW; Lam EW; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18617108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.
Ishak MH; Zhun OC; Shaari R; Rahman SA; Hasan MN; Alam MK
Mymensingh Med J; 2014 Oct; 23(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 25481601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the Mesiodistal Angulations of Canine and Molar Teeth in Different Types of Orthodontic Malocclusions: A Retrospective Study.
Cicek O; Yilmaz H; Demir Cicek B
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Apr; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37046569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cone-beam computed tomography classification of the mandibular second molar root morphology and its relationship to panoramic radiographic appearance.
Funakoshi T; Shibata T; Inamoto K; Shibata N; Ariji Y; Fukuda M; Nakata K; Ariji E
Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):494-501. PubMed ID: 33048311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy and reliability of the expected root position setup methodology to evaluate root position during orthodontic treatment.
Lee RJ; Pi S; Park J; Devgon D; Nelson G; Hatcher D; Oberoi S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):583-595. PubMed ID: 30268268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
