BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37164491)

  • 1. Improving the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring: the fetal reserve index.
    Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM; Devoe LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5S):S1129-S1143. PubMed ID: 37164491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined prenatal and postnatal prediction of early neonatal compromise risk.
    Eden RD; Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM; Gallagher P; Schifrin BS
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(18):2996-3007. PubMed ID: 31581872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safely lowering the emergency Cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates using the Fetal Reserve Index.
    Eden RD; Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 May; 33(9):1473-1479. PubMed ID: 30269624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.
    Alfirevic Z; Devane D; Gyte GM; Cuthbert A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 2(2):CD006066. PubMed ID: 28157275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia.
    Clark SL; Hamilton EF; Garite TJ; Timmins A; Warrick PA; Smith S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 216(2):163.e1-163.e6. PubMed ID: 27751795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-engineering the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring to identify reversible risk for cerebral palsy: a case control series.
    Evans MI; Eden RD; Britt DW; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(15):2561-2569. PubMed ID: 29447043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring features associated with a clinical diagnosis of nonreassuring fetal status.
    Rimsza RR; Frolova AI; Kelly JC; Carter EB; Cahill AG; Raghuraman N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Sep; 5(9):101068. PubMed ID: 37380056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changing Perspectives of Electronic Fetal Monitoring.
    Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM; Devoe LD
    Reprod Sci; 2022 Jun; 29(6):1874-1894. PubMed ID: 34664218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mid forceps did not cause "compromised babies" - "compromise" caused forceps: an approach toward safely lowering the cesarean delivery rate.
    Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):5265-5273. PubMed ID: 33494634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Earlier and improved screening for impending fetal compromise.
    Evans MI; Britt DW; Eden RD; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Aug; 35(15):2895-2903. PubMed ID: 32873102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reengineering Electronic Fetal Monitoring Interpretation: Using the Fetal Reserve Index to Anticipate the Need for Emergent Operative Delivery.
    Eden RD; Evans MI; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
    Reprod Sci; 2018 Apr; 25(4):487-497. PubMed ID: 29137550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of electronic fetal monitoring.
    Knupp RJ; Andrews WW; Tita ATN
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Aug; 67():44-52. PubMed ID: 32299728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour.
    Neilson JP
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 May; (5):CD000116. PubMed ID: 23728630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Refining the Prediction and Prevention of Emergency Operative Deliveries with the Fetal Reserve Index.
    Britt DW; Evans MI; Schifrin BS; Eden RD
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2019; 46(3):159-165. PubMed ID: 30463080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Manual fetal stimulation during intrapartum fetal surveillance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Tahmina S; Daniel M; Krishnan L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100574. PubMed ID: 35051669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour.
    Neilson JP
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Apr; (4):CD000116. PubMed ID: 22513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical significance of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in twins.
    Dera-Szymanowska A; Polska M; Markwitz W; Moczko J; Horst N; Szymanowski K
    Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(10):839-844. PubMed ID: 36378125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The "Fetal Reserve Index": Re-Engineering the Interpretation and Responses to Fetal Heart Rate Patterns.
    Eden RD; Evans MI; Evans SM; Schifrin BS
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2018; 43(2):90-104. PubMed ID: 28591756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
    Vayssière C; Haumonte JB; Chantry A; Coatleven F; Debord MP; Gomez C; Le Ray C; Lopez E; Salomon LJ; Senat MV; Sentilhes L; Serry A; Winer N; Grandjean H; Verspyck E; Subtil D;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 23434325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.