These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37164798)

  • 41. Evaluation of the Reliability and Quality of YouTube Video Content about Perianal Fistulas.
    Eroglu E; Altinli E
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():2955273. PubMed ID: 36440357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Reliability and Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Dietary Guidance for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Cross-sectional Study.
    He Z; Wang Z; Song Y; Liu Y; Kang L; Fang X; Wang T; Fan X; Li Z; Wang S; Bai Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Feb; 25():e41518. PubMed ID: 36757757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. YouTube as a source of information on systemic sclerosis.
    Unal-Ulutatar C; Ulutatar F
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2022 Aug; 25(8):887-892. PubMed ID: 35666007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessment of quality and reliability of YouTube videos for patient and physician education on inflammatory myositis.
    Joshi M; R N; Jagtap K; Gupta R; Agarwal V; Aggarwal R; Goel A; Gupta L
    Clin Rheumatol; 2023 May; 42(5):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 36759401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Assessing the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information on inflammatory back pain.
    Kara M; Ozduran E; Mercan Kara M; Hanci V; Erkin Y
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17215. PubMed ID: 38618560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing the Quality of YouTube Videos on Adhesive Capsulitis.
    Tang K; Azhar U; Babar M; Ahmed A; Oh A; Day W; Harb H; Chan FJ
    Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e27406. PubMed ID: 36046306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An Assessment of Available Information on the World Wide Web for Patients with Lower Limb Arterial Disease.
    Dar T; Chowdhury MM; Coughlin PA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2021 Apr; 61(4):620-627. PubMed ID: 33589327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Educational quality of YouTube content on brachial plexus injury and treatment.
    Mendiratta D; Liggio DF; Levidy MF; Mahajan J; Chu A; McGrath A
    Microsurgery; 2024 Jan; 44(1):e31099. PubMed ID: 37578115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Youtube as a source of information vagal nerve stimulation: A quality analysis.
    Özçelik A; Özbaş C; Arhan E
    Epilepsy Behav; 2024 Feb; 151():109597. PubMed ID: 38181534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.
    Kunze KN; Krivicich LM; Verma NN; Chahla J
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):233-238. PubMed ID: 31864582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. YouTube as a Source of Information on Lipedema: Property, Quality, and Reliability Assessment.
    Esen Özdemir E; Borman P; Mete Civelek G; Umaroğlu MM
    Lymphat Res Biol; 2023 Aug; 21(4):403-409. PubMed ID: 36927077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Pain Management After Cesarean Birth: Content Analysis.
    Squires NA; Soyemi E; Yee LM; Birch EM; Badreldin N
    JMIR Infodemiology; 2023 Jun; 3():e40802. PubMed ID: 37351938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study.
    Kılınç DD
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 123(5):e349-e354. PubMed ID: 35470122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15412. PubMed ID: 37492399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment of the quality and reliability of the information on spasticity on youtube.
    Uz C; Umay E; Ballı Uz F; Cankurtaran D; Gundogdu I
    J Clin Neurosci; 2023 Jul; 113():142-146. PubMed ID: 37269749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. YouTube as a source of information on keratoconus: a social media analysis.
    Seyyar SA; Tıskaoğlu NS
    Clin Exp Optom; 2023 Jan; 106(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 34877926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of educational value of YouTube videos addressing robotic pyeloplasty in children.
    Adorisio O; Silveri M; Torino G
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Jun; 17(3):390.e1-390.e4. PubMed ID: 33558173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Hysteroscopy in the new media: quality and reliability analysis of hysteroscopy procedures on YouTube™.
    Libretti A; Vitale SG; Saponara S; Corsini C; Aquino CI; Savasta F; Tizzoni E; Troìa L; Surico D; Angioni S; Remorgida V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Nov; 308(5):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 37568070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient information source on intravitreal injection procedures.
    Seyyar SA; Mete A; Tıskaoğlu NS
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2022 Sep; 45(7):748-755. PubMed ID: 35701305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The usefulness and validity of English-language videos on YouTube as an educational resource for spondyloarthritis.
    Elangovan S; Kwan YH; Fong W
    Clin Rheumatol; 2021 Apr; 40(4):1567-1573. PubMed ID: 32880051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.