These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37165554)

  • 1. A sequential Bayesian changepoint detection procedure for aberrant behaviours in computerized testing.
    Lu J; Wang C; Zhang J; Wang X
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Feb; 77(1):31-54. PubMed ID: 37165554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Two-Stage Approach to Differentiating Normal and Aberrant Behavior in Computer Based Testing.
    Wang C; Xu G; Shang Z
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):223-254. PubMed ID: 27796763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling item revisiting behavior in computer-based testing: Exploring the effect of item revisitations as collateral information.
    Zhang J; Wang C; Lu J
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Aug; 56(5):4661-4681. PubMed ID: 37608234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting Multiple Random Changepoints in Bayesian Piecewise Growth Mixture Models.
    Lock EF; Kohli N; Bose M
    Psychometrika; 2018 Sep; 83(3):733-750. PubMed ID: 29150814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Mixture Response Time Process Model for Aberrant Behaviors and Item Nonresponses.
    Lu J; Wang C; Shi N
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 34355994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian mixture model for changepoint estimation using ordinal predictors.
    Roberts E; Zhao L
    Int J Biostat; 2021 Apr; 18(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 33823087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.
    Wang C; Xu G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):456-77. PubMed ID: 25873487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A pairwise likelihood-based approach for changepoint detection in multivariate time series models.
    Ma TF; Yau CY
    Biometrika; 2016 Jun; 103(2):409-421. PubMed ID: 27279666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asynchronous Changepoint Estimation for Spatially Correlated Functional Time Series.
    Wang M; Harris T; Li B
    J Agric Biol Environ Stat; 2023; 28(1):157-176. PubMed ID: 36275915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated selection of changepoints using empirical
    Quinn M; Chung A; Glass K
    JAMIA Open; 2022 Dec; 5(4):ooac090. PubMed ID: 36325307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Likelihood ratios for changepoints in categorical event data with applications in digital forensics.
    Longjohn R; Smyth P
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1289-1303. PubMed ID: 38558223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-iterative sampling-based Bayesian methods for identifying changepoints in the sequence of cases of haemolytic uraemic syndrome.
    Tian GL; Ng KW; Li KC; Tan M
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2009 Jul; 53(9):3314-3323. PubMed ID: 20161336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Bayesian zero-inflated beta-binomial model for longitudinal data with group-specific changepoints.
    Wen CC; Baker N; Paul R; Hill E; Hunt K; Li H; Gray K; Neelon B
    Stat Med; 2024 Jan; 43(1):125-140. PubMed ID: 37942694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-selection inference for changepoint detection algorithms with application to copy number variation data.
    Hyun S; Lin KZ; G'Sell M; Tibshirani RJ
    Biometrics; 2021 Sep; 77(3):1037-1049. PubMed ID: 33434289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of parameters in Bayesian Online Changepoint Detection: detecting early warning of mount Merapi eruptions.
    Sholihat SS; Indratno SW; Mukhaiyar U
    Heliyon; 2021 Jul; 7(7):e07482. PubMed ID: 34377849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian Analysis of Aberrant Response and Response Time Data.
    Zhang Z; Zhang J; Lu J
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():841372. PubMed ID: 35548497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():83-112. PubMed ID: 31709521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compromised item detection: A Bayesian change-point perspective.
    Du Y; Zhang S; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):131-153. PubMed ID: 36069306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A greedy graph search algorithm based on changepoint analysis for automatic QRS complex detection.
    Fotoohinasab A; Hocking T; Afghah F
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Mar; 130():104208. PubMed ID: 33484946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improvements in the reconstruction of time-varying gene regulatory networks: dynamic programming and regularization by information sharing among genes.
    Grzegorczyk M; Husmeier D
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Mar; 27(5):693-9. PubMed ID: 21177328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.