These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37167008)

  • 21. Sequential multiple assignment randomization trials with enrichment design.
    Liu Y; Wang Y; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):378-390. PubMed ID: 27598622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A novel approach to assess dynamic treatment regimes embedded in a SMART with an ordinal outcome.
    Ghosh P; Yan X; Chakraborty B
    Stat Med; 2023 Mar; 42(7):1096-1111. PubMed ID: 36726310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Experimental design and primary data analysis methods for comparing adaptive interventions.
    Nahum-Shani I; Qian M; Almirall D; Pelham WE; Gnagy B; Fabiano GA; Waxmonsky JG; Yu J; Murphy SA
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):457-477. PubMed ID: 23025433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of research electronic data capture (REDCap) in a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): a practical example of automating double randomization.
    Lee CA; Gamino D; Lore M; Donelson C; Windsor LC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):162. PubMed ID: 37415099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Augmented outcome-weighted learning for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimens.
    Liu Y; Wang Y; Kosorok MR; Zhao Y; Zeng D
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(26):3776-3788. PubMed ID: 29873099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of research electronic data capture (REDCap) in a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): A practical example of automating double randomization.
    Lee CA; Gamino D; Lore M; Donelson C; Windsor LC
    Res Sq; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36865151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interim monitoring in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.
    Wu L; Wang J; Wahed AS
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):368-380. PubMed ID: 34571583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Integrating randomized and observational studies to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes.
    Batorsky A; Anstrom KJ; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38804219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A multiple imputation strategy for sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.
    Shortreed SM; Laber E; Scott Stroup T; Pineau J; Murphy SA
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4202-14. PubMed ID: 24919867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance of analytical methods for overdispersed counts in cluster randomized trials: sample size, degree of clustering and imbalance.
    Durán Pacheco G; Hattendorf J; Colford JM; Mäusezahl D; Smith T
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2989-3011. PubMed ID: 19672840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) in oncology: systematic review of published studies.
    Lorenzoni G; Petracci E; Scarpi E; Baldi I; Gregori D; Nanni O
    Br J Cancer; 2023 Mar; 128(7):1177-1188. PubMed ID: 36572731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cumulative incidence regression for dynamic treatment regimens.
    Chen LW; Yavuz I; Cheng Y; Wahed AS
    Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):e113-e130. PubMed ID: 30371745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Design of sequentially randomized trials for testing adaptive treatment strategies.
    Ogbagaber SB; Karp J; Wahed AS
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):840-58. PubMed ID: 26412033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sample size calculations for group randomized trials with unequal group sizes through Monte Carlo simulations.
    Shi Y; Lee JH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2569-2580. PubMed ID: 30103663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA
    Cook JA; Julious SA; Sones W; Hampson LV; Hewitt C; Berlin JA; Ashby D; Emsley R; Fergusson DA; Walters SJ; Wilson EC; MacLennan G; Stallard N; Rothwell JC; Bland M; Brown L; Ramsay CR; Cook A; Armstrong D; Altman D; Vale LD
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct; 23(60):1-88. PubMed ID: 31661431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy.
    Almirall D; Compton SN; Gunlicks-Stoessel M; Duan N; Murphy SA
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(17):1887-902. PubMed ID: 22438190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robustness of methods for blinded sample size re-estimation with overdispersed count data.
    Schneider S; Schmidli H; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(21):3623-35. PubMed ID: 23595966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Statistical Considerations and Software for Designing Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trials (SMART) with a Survival Final Endpoint.
    Kravets S; Ruppert AS; Jacobson SB; Le-Rademacher JG; Mandrekar SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):539-552. PubMed ID: 37434437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dynamic treatment regimens in small n, sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials: An application in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.
    Chao YC; Trachtman H; Gipson DS; Spino C; Braun TM; Kidwell KM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 May; 92():105989. PubMed ID: 32200006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.