These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37167364)
1. Accuracy of dental implant placement with a robotic system in partially edentulous patients: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial. Chen W; Al-Taezi KA; Chu CH; Shen Y; Wu J; Cai K; Chen P; Tang C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):707-718. PubMed ID: 37167364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study. Wang W; Xu H; Mei D; Zhou C; Li X; Han Z; Zhou X; Li X; Zhao B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 37728030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study. Li P; Chen J; Li A; Luo K; Xu S; Yang S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 37855331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches. Bolding SL; Reebye UN J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33678441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of flapless surgery using an autonomous robotic system in full-arch immediate implant restoration: A case series. Shu Q; Chen D; Wang X; Liu Q; Ge Y; Su Y J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105017. PubMed ID: 38657725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position among freehand implant placement, static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: a non-randomized prospective study. Jaemsuwan S; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 52(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 35752531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: A retrospective study. Zhang S; Cai Q; Chen W; Lin Y; Gao Y; Wu D; Chen J Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Feb; 35(2):220-229. PubMed ID: 38033198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and safety of a haptic operated and machine vision controlled collaborative robot for dental implant placement: A translational study. Qiao SC; Wu XY; Shi JY; Tonetti MS; Lai HC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Aug; 34(8):839-849. PubMed ID: 37309242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of the number and distribution of fiducial markers on the accuracy of robot-guided implant surgery in edentulous mandibular arches: An in vitro study. Zhao Y; Liao Y; Wu X; Zhang Y; Shi B; Yan Q J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104529. PubMed ID: 37105431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study. Tao B; Feng Y; Fan X; Zhuang M; Chen X; Wang F; Wu Y J Dent; 2022 Aug; 123():104170. PubMed ID: 35679989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study. Shusterman A; Nashef R; Tecco S; Mangano C; Lerner H; Mangano FG J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105052. PubMed ID: 38734298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study. Taheri Otaghsara SS; Joda T; Thieringer FM J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104487. PubMed ID: 36948382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of static fully guided implant placement in the posterior area of partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study. Gargallo-Albiol J; Zilleruelo-Pozo MJ; Lucas-Taulé E; Muñoz-Peñalver J; Paternostro-Betancourt D; Hernandez-Alfaro F Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2783-2791. PubMed ID: 34782925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery. Smitkarn P; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Sep; 46(9):949-957. PubMed ID: 31241782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery for completely edentulous patients. A proof of a concept. Pomares-Puig C; Sánchez-Garcés MA; Jorba-García A J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104443. PubMed ID: 36720424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro and in vivo accuracy of autonomous robotic vs. fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery. He J; Zhang Q; Wang X; Fu M; Zhang H; Song L; Pu R; Jiang Z; Yang G Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):385-401. PubMed ID: 38214435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical accuracy of partially guided implant placement in edentulous patients: A computed tomography-based retrospective study. Wang B; Yang J; Siow L; Wang Y; Zhang X; Zhou Y; Yu M; Wang H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 37814971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series. Wang J; Ge Y; Mühlemann S; Pan S; Jung RE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1278-1288. PubMed ID: 37642206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]