These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37167445)
1. Acceptance and Benefit of Electroacoustic Stimulation in Children. Spitzer ER; Kay-Rivest E; Waltzman SB; O'Brien-Russo CA; Santacatterina M; Roland JT; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):453-461. PubMed ID: 37167445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays. Spitzer ER; Waltzman SB; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 32721977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes and Predictive Factors of Electroacoustic Stimulation Rehabilitation in Children With Limited Low-Frequency Hearing. Nam GS; Song MH; Choi JY; Jung J Otol Neurotol; 2019 Oct; 40(9):e894-e900. PubMed ID: 31498289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Slim Modiolar Electrode Placement in Candidates for Electroacoustic Stimulation. Kay-Rivest E; Winchester A; McMenomey SO; Jethanamest D; Roland JT; Friedmann DR Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):566-571. PubMed ID: 36534657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception. Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Polak M; Driscoll CL; Roland P; Buchman CA Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 23446225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hearing Preservation During Cochlear Implantation and Electroacoustic Stimulation in Patients With SLC26A4 Mutations. Roh KJ; Park S; Jung JS; Moon IS; Kim SH; Bang MY; Choi JY Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):1262-1267. PubMed ID: 28796087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation. Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hearing preservation in children with electric-acoustic stimulation after cochlear implantation : Outcome after electrode insertion with minimal insertion trauma. Rader T; Bohnert A; Matthias C; Koutsimpelas D; Kainz MA; Strieth S HNO; 2018 Jul; 66(Suppl 2):56-62. PubMed ID: 30132125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing Preservation Outcomes With Standard Length Electrodes in Adult Cochlear Implantation and the Uptake of Electroacoustic Stimulation. Harrison L; Manjaly JG; Ellis W; Lavy JA; Shaida A; Khalil SS; Saeed SR Otol Neurotol; 2020 Sep; 41(8):1060-1065. PubMed ID: 32569131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hearing preservation in children with electric-acoustic stimulation after cochlear implantation : Outcome after electrode insertion with minimal insertion trauma (German version)]. Rader T; Bohnert A; Matthias C; Koutsimpelas D; Kainz MA; Strieth S HNO; 2018 Sep; 66(9):660-667. PubMed ID: 29971537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients. Tejani VD; Kim JS; Etler CP; Skidmore J; Yuan Y; He S; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 36790447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter US Clinical Trial With an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes. Pillsbury HC; Dillon MT; Buchman CA; Staecker H; Prentiss SM; Ruckenstein MJ; Bigelow DC; Telischi FF; Martinez DM; Runge CL; Friedland DR; Blevins NH; Larky JB; Alexiades G; Kaylie DM; Roland PS; Miyamoto RT; Backous DD; Warren FM; El-Kashlan HK; Slager HK; Reyes C; Racey AI; Adunka OF Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 29342054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Reality of Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: Who Is Utilizing EAS? Perkins E; Lee J; Manzoor N; O'Malley M; Bennett M; Labadie R; Rivas A; Haynes D; Gifford R Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jul; 42(6):832-837. PubMed ID: 34111047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode. Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Outcomes in Children. Park LR; Teagle HFB; Gagnon E; Woodard J; Brown KD Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 30252685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]