These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37167445)
21. Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation. James CJ; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Lenarz T; Mawman D; Ramos A; Ramsden R; Sterkers O Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():57-62. PubMed ID: 17063012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Identification of Pure-Tone Audiologic Thresholds for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidacy: A Systematic Review. de Kleijn JL; van Kalmthout LWM; van der Vossen MJB; Vonck BMD; Topsakal V; Bruijnzeel H JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jul; 144(7):630-638. PubMed ID: 29800000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant. Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report. Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech Recognition and Subjective Hearing Abilities for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users With Unilateral Hearing Loss. Dillon MT; Buss E; Thompson NJ; Richter ME; Davis AG; Overton AB; Rooth MA; Canfarotta MW; Selleck AM; Dedmon MM; Brown KD Otol Neurotol; 2024 Oct; 45(9):1006-1011. PubMed ID: 39165094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study. Kleine Punte A; Vermeire K; Van de Heyning P Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():144-152. PubMed ID: 19955731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cochlear Implantation in Children with Postlingual Progressive Steeply Sloping High-Frequency Hearing Loss. Meredith MA; Rubinstein JT; Sie KCY; Norton SJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):913-919. PubMed ID: 29130439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation. D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cochlear implantation in patients with bilateral Ménière's syndrome. Lustig LR; Yeagle J; Niparko JK; Minor LB Otol Neurotol; 2003 May; 24(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 12806291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hearing Preservation Outcomes With a Mid-Scala Electrode in Cochlear Implantation. Hunter JB; Gifford RH; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Bennett ML; Haynes DS; Rivas A Otol Neurotol; 2016 Mar; 37(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 26825671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant. Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss--implications for patient selection. Kiefer J; von Ilberg C; Reimer B; Knecht R; Gall V; Diller G; Stürzebecher E; Pfennigdorff T; Spelsberg A Audiology; 1998; 37(6):382-95. PubMed ID: 9888194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects. Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Residual hearing preservation after pediatric cochlear implantation. Brown RF; Hullar TE; Cadieux JH; Chole RA Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1221-6. PubMed ID: 20818293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users. Yoon YS; Shin YR; Kim JM; Coltisor A; Chun YM Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):106-115. PubMed ID: 30694120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation. Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids. Davidson LS Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]