These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure. Coffman DL; Zhou J; Cai X BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):168. PubMed ID: 32586271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis. Choi J; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 30341708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data. Hong G Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Squeezing observational data for better causal inference: Methods and examples for prevention research. Garcia-Huidobro D; Michael Oakes J Int J Psychol; 2017 Apr; 52(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 27094382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Handling of missing data with multiple imputation in observational studies that address causal questions: protocol for a scoping review. Mainzer R; Moreno-Betancur M; Nguyen C; Simpson J; Carlin J; Lee K BMJ Open; 2023 Feb; 13(2):e065576. PubMed ID: 36725096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies. Hogan JW; Lancaster T Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies. Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data]. Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Explicating the Conditions Under Which Multilevel Multiple Imputation Mitigates Bias Resulting from Random Coefficient-Dependent Missing Longitudinal Data. Gottfredson NC; Sterba SK; Jackson KM Prev Sci; 2017 Jan; 18(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 27866307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing risk of bias: a proposal for a unified framework for observational studies and randomized trials. Luijendijk HJ; Page MJ; Burger H; Koolman X BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):237. PubMed ID: 32967622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. Little RJ; Rubin DB Annu Rev Public Health; 2000; 21():121-45. PubMed ID: 10884949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Data Missing Not at Random in Mobile Health Research: Assessment of the Problem and a Case for Sensitivity Analyses. Goldberg SB; Bolt DM; Davidson RJ J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jun; 23(6):e26749. PubMed ID: 34128810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How are missing data in covariates handled in observational time-to-event studies in oncology? A systematic review. Carroll OU; Morris TP; Keogh RH BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):134. PubMed ID: 32471366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used? Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dealing with missing delirium assessments in prospective clinical studies of the critically ill: a simulation study and reanalysis of two delirium studies. Raman R; Chen W; Harhay MO; Thompson JL; Ely EW; Pandharipande PP; Patel MB BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):97. PubMed ID: 33952189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs. Colditz GA Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2010; 50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. PubMed ID: 21132580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]