195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37168367)
1. Comparison of ultrasound-based ADNEX model with magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating adnexal masses: a multi-center study.
Hu Y; Chen B; Dong H; Sheng B; Xiao Z; Li J; Tian W; Lv F
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1101297. PubMed ID: 37168367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subjective assessment and IOTA ADNEX model in evaluation of adnexal masses in patients with history of breast cancer.
Pozzati F; Sassu CM; Marini G; Mascilini F; Biscione A; Giannarelli D; Garganese G; Fragomeni SM; Scambia G; Testa AC; Moro F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 37204769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of IOTA ADNEX model in evaluating adnexal masses in a gynecological oncology center in China.
Chen H; Qian L; Jiang M; Du Q; Yuan F; Feng W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):815-822. PubMed ID: 31152572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map.
Hottat NA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 32438461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of ADNEX and IOTA two-step strategy and estimation of risk of complications during follow-up of adnexal masses in low-risk population.
Pascual MA; Vancraeynest L; Timmerman S; Ceusters J; Ledger A; Graupera B; Rodriguez I; Valero B; Landolfo C; Testa AC; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Van Calster B; Froyman W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The ADNEX model to triage adnexal masses: An external validation study and comparison with the IOTA two-step strategy and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound operator.
Viora E; Piovano E; Baima Poma C; Cotrino I; Castiglione A; Cavallero C; Sciarrone A; Bastonero S; Iskra L; Zola P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():207-211. PubMed ID: 32146226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of different NEoplasias in the adneXa model for differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in Korean women.
Nam G; Lee SR; Jeong K; Kim SH; Moon HS; Chae HD
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2021 May; 64(3):293-299. PubMed ID: 33593045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions.
Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smolen A; Łoziński T; Guzik P; Kluz T
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36900029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of the Ultrasound ADNEX Model for Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors.
Peng XS; Ma Y; Wang LL; Li HX; Zheng XL; Liu Y
Int J Gen Med; 2021; 14():5665-5673. PubMed ID: 34557021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Accuracies of the Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ADNEX Scoring Systems For Ovarian Adnexal Mass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cui L; Xu H; Zhang Y
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):897-908. PubMed ID: 34217614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External validation of the MR imaging scoring system for the management of adnexal masses.
Ruiz M; Labauge P; Louboutin A; Limot O; Fauconnier A; Huchon C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():115-9. PubMed ID: 27583370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System with final histological diagnosis in adnexal masses: a retrospective study.
Filiz AA; Kahyaoglu S; Atalay CR
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2024 Jan; 67(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 37822234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification.
Pelayo M; Sancho-Sauco J; Sánchez-Zurdo J; Perez-Mies B; Abarca-Martínez L; Cancelo-Hidalgo MJ; Sainz-Bueno JA; Alcázar JL; Pelayo-Delgado I
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 37685323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating use of IOTA two-step strategy to classify adnexal masses identified in pregnancy: pilot study.
Barcroft J; Pandrich M; Del Forno S; Cooper N; Linton-Reid K; Landolfo C; Timmerman D; Saso S; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38787921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating the risk of malignancy of adnexal masses: validation of the ADNEX model in the hands of nonexpert ultrasonographers in a gynaecological oncology centre in China.
He P; Wang JJ; Duan W; Song C; Yang Y; Wu QQ
J Ovarian Res; 2021 Dec; 14(1):169. PubMed ID: 34857005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
