119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37169459)
1. Effect of swabbing technique and duration on forensic DNA recovery.
Abdullah A; Szkuta B; Meakin GE
Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):343-348. PubMed ID: 37169459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the M-Vac
McLamb JM; Adams LD; Kavlick MF
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1828-1834. PubMed ID: 32687222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The DNA-Buster: The evaluation of an alternative DNA recovery approach.
Währer J; Kehm S; Allen M; Brauer L; Eidam O; Seiberle I; Kron S; Scheurer E; Schulz I
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 May; 64():102830. PubMed ID: 36702080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The double-swab technique versus single swabs for human DNA recovery from various surfaces.
Hedman J; Jansson L; Akel Y; Wallmark N; Gutierrez Liljestrand R; Forsberg C; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102253. PubMed ID: 32007674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
Pang BC; Cheung BK
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of tapelifting as a collection method for touch DNA.
Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 24315606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pulse Lavage System (PLS) versus forensic wet-vacuum collection of biological material.
Chaudhry HS; Kavlick MF
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 May; 64():102845. PubMed ID: 36780844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabbing systems for touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces.
Bonsu DOM; Rodie M; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Dec; 17(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 34674113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of a Sonicating Swab for Removal and Capture of Microorganisms from Experimental and Natural Contaminated Surfaces.
Ahnrud GP; Mendoza AJ; Hurley MJ; Marek PJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 May; 84(9):. PubMed ID: 29500264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Problems associated with traditional hygiene swabbing: the need for in-house standardization.
Moore G; Griffith C
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):1090-103. PubMed ID: 17897214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of the M-Vac® wet-vacuum system as a method for DNA recovery.
Vickar T; Bache K; Daniel B; Frascione N
Sci Justice; 2018 Jul; 58(4):282-286. PubMed ID: 29895461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An improved method to recover saliva from human skin: the double swab technique.
Sweet D; Lorente M; Lorente JA; Valenzuela A; Villanueva E
J Forensic Sci; 1997 Mar; 42(2):320-2. PubMed ID: 9068193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Touch DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridges: Comparison of swabbing, tape lifting and soaking.
Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111101. PubMed ID: 34801815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recovery of Trace DNA on Clothing: A Comparison of Mini-tape Lifting and Three Other Forensic Evidence Collection Techniques.
Hess S; Haas C
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):187-191. PubMed ID: 27864934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the efficiency of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabs for recovery of DNA from metal surfaces.
Bonsu DOM; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Jun; 17(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 33180274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
