132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37169467)
1. A comprehensive study into false positive rates for 'other' biological samples using common presumptive testing methods.
Stroud A; Gamblin A; Birchall P; Harbison S; Opperman S
Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 37169467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of infrared radiation, solar radiation, and burial exposure on the efficacy of forensic immunoassay testing for blood, semen, and saliva.
Kirchner CL; Conlan XA; Durdle A
Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jun; 361():112106. PubMed ID: 38924941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of ABAcard(®) p30 and RSID™-Semen test kits for forensic semen identification.
Boward ES; Wilson SL
J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):1126-30. PubMed ID: 24237835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the background levels of body fluids on hands.
Douglas H; Fraser I; Davidson G; Murphy C; Gorman ML; Boyce M; Doole S
Sci Justice; 2023 Jul; 63(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 37453781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evaluation and validation of Phadebas
Wornes DJ; Speers SJ; Murakami JA
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():81-88. PubMed ID: 29734053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of forensic tests to distinguish blowfly artifacts from human blood, semen, and saliva.
Durdle A; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Mar; 60(2):468-70. PubMed ID: 25407611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.
Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Specificity, sensitivity, and operability of RSID™-urine for forensic identification of urine: comparison with ELISA for Tamm-Horsfall protein.
Akutsu T; Watanabe K; Sakurada K
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Nov; 57(6):1570-3. PubMed ID: 22563762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applicability of three commercially available kits for forensic identification of blood stains.
Horjan I; Barbaric L; Mrsic G
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Feb; 38():101-5. PubMed ID: 26748240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acid phosphatase test on Phadebas
Herman Y; Feine I; Gafny R
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():218-222. PubMed ID: 29775922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of blood on clothing laundered with sodium percarbonate.
Howard D; Chaseling J; Wright K
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109885. PubMed ID: 31430678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity and specificity of presumptive tests for blood, saliva and semen.
Vennemann M; Scott G; Curran L; Bittner F; Tobe SS
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2014 Mar; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 24443142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Applicability of ELISA detection of statherin for forensic identification of saliva.
Akutsu T; Watanabe K; Fujinami Y; Sakurada K
Int J Legal Med; 2010 Sep; 124(5):493-8. PubMed ID: 19953261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the effect of ozone disinfection on forensic identification of blood, saliva, and semen stains.
Fejes V; Simon G; Makszin L; Sipos K; Poor VS
Sci Justice; 2024 Mar; 64(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 38431372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of Polilight in the detection of seminal fluid, saliva, and bloodstains and comparison with conventional chemical-based screening tests.
Vandenberg N; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):361-70. PubMed ID: 16566772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simplified protocol for the detection of blood, saliva, and semen from a single biological trace using immunochromatographic tests.
Basset P; Blandin P; Grini A; Delemont S; Samie L; Castella V
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2022 Jun; 18(2):141-148. PubMed ID: 35171453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applicability of two commercially available kits for forensic identification of saliva stains.
Pang BC; Cheung BK
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1117-22. PubMed ID: 18637870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of mark enhancement techniques on the subsequent detection of saliva.
McAllister P; Graham E; Deacon P; Farrugia KJ
Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):305-320. PubMed ID: 27702446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Developmental validation of the ParaDNA
Blackman S; Stafford-Allen B; Hanson EK; Panasiuk M; Brooker AL; Rendell P; Ballantyne J; Wells S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():151-161. PubMed ID: 30176437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developmental validation of RSID™-Semen: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of human semen.
Old J; Schweers BA; Boonlayangoor PW; Fischer B; Miller KW; Reich K
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):489-99. PubMed ID: 22211796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
