These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37169469)

  • 1. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in a forensic footwear database.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 37169469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in footwear: Part I - Impressions in blood.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jan; 64(1):117-133. PubMed ID: 38182307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in footwear: Part II - Impressions in dust.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jan; 64(1):134-150. PubMed ID: 38182308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Location distribution of randomly acquired characteristics on a shoe sole.
    Kaplan-Damary N; Mandel M; Yekutieli Y; Shor Y; Wiesner S
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Sep; 67(5):1801-1809. PubMed ID: 35855550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial frequency of randomly acquired characteristics on outsoles.
    Richetelli N; Speir JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Sep; 67(5):1810-1824. PubMed ID: 35943117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manufacturing processes for athletic shoe outsoles and their significance in the examination of footwear impression evidence.
    Bodziak WJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1986 Jan; 31(1):153-76. PubMed ID: 3944559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative assessment of similarity between randomly acquired characteristics on high quality exemplars and crime scene impressions via analysis of feature size and shape.
    Richetelli N; Nobel M; Bodziak WJ; Speir JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():211-222. PubMed ID: 27838107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative evaluation of footwear evidence: Initial workflow for an end-to-end system.
    Venkatasubramanian G; Hegde V; Lund SP; Iyer H; Herman M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2232-2251. PubMed ID: 34374992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of forensic footwear examiner decisions.
    Austin Hicklin R; McVicker BC; Parks C; LeMay J; Richetelli N; Smith M; Buscaglia J; Perlman RS; Peters EM; Eckenrode BA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Oct; 339():111418. PubMed ID: 35987091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical discrimination of footwear: a method for the comparison of accidentals on shoe outsoles inspired by facial recognition techniques.
    Petraco ND; Gambino C; Kubic TA; Olivio D; Petraco N
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 19895540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying randomly acquired characteristics on outsoles in terms of shape and position.
    Speir JA; Richetelli N; Fagert M; Hite M; Bodziak WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():399-411. PubMed ID: 27416269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirically observed and predicted estimates of chance association: Estimating the chance association of randomly acquired characteristics in footwear comparisons.
    Richetelli N; Bodziak WJ; Speir JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109833. PubMed ID: 31539827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dataset of Digitized RACs and Their Rarity Score Analysis for Strengthening Shoeprint Evidence.
    Wiesner S; Shor Y; Tsach T; Kaplan-Damary N; Yekutieli Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):762-774. PubMed ID: 31738459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical note: The Next Step - a semi-automatic coding and comparison system for forensic footwear impressions.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Pertsev R; Issan Y; Pasternak Z; Cohen A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Aug; 337():111378. PubMed ID: 35839684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simulated crime scene footwear impression database for teaching and research purposes.
    Lin ET; DeBat T; Speir JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):726-734. PubMed ID: 34750820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novices cannot fill the examiners' shoes: Evidence of footwear examiners' expertise in shoe comparisons.
    Chapman R; Summersby S; Lang T; Raymond J; Ballantyne K
    Sci Justice; 2023 Sep; 63(5):598-611. PubMed ID: 37718007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dependence among randomly acquired characteristics on shoeprints and their features.
    Kaplan Damary N; Mandel M; Wiesner S; Yekutieli Y; Shor Y; Spiegelman C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Feb; 283():173-179. PubMed ID: 29324348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation and comparison of the electrostatic dust print lifter and the electrostatic detection apparatus on the development of footwear impressions on paper.
    Craig CL; Hornsby BM; Riles M
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):819-26. PubMed ID: 16882226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulating forensic casework scenarios in experimental studies: The generation of footwear marks in blood.
    McElhone RL; Meakin GE; French JC; Alexander T; Morgan RM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():34-40. PubMed ID: 27017082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A database of two-dimensional images of footwear outsole impressions.
    Park S; Carriquiry A
    Data Brief; 2020 Jun; 30():105508. PubMed ID: 32322634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.