165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37170165)
21. How predation risk affects the temporal dynamics of avian leks: greater sage grouse versus golden eagles.
Boyko AR
Am Nat; 2004 Jan; 163(1):154-65. PubMed ID: 14767844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lekking without a paradox in the buff-breasted sandpiper.
Lanctot RB; Scribner KT; Lanctot RB; Weatherhead PJ; Kempenaers B
Am Nat; 1997 Jun; 149(6):1051-70. PubMed ID: 18811263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is bigger better? Male body size affects wing-borne courtship signals and mating success in the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae).
Benelli G; Donati E; Romano D; Ragni G; Bonsignori G; Stefanini C; Canale A
Insect Sci; 2016 Dec; 23(6):869-880. PubMed ID: 26173571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Do males choose their mates in the lekking moth Achroia grisella? Influence of female body mass and male reproductive status on male mate choice.
Goubault M; Burlaud R
Insect Sci; 2018 Oct; 25(5):861-868. PubMed ID: 28432814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.
Miller CW; Moore AJ
Proc Biol Sci; 2007 May; 274(1615):1279-86. PubMed ID: 17341455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Spatial distribution and male mating success of Anopheles gambiae swarms.
Diabaté A; Yaro AS; Dao A; Diallo M; Huestis DL; Lehmann T
BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Jun; 11():184. PubMed ID: 21711542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Overt female mate competition and preference for central males in a lekking antelope.
Bro-Jørgensen J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Jul; 99(14):9290-3. PubMed ID: 12089329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Opportunity for sexual selection and effective population size in the lek-breeding European treefrog (Hyla arborea).
Broquet T; Jaquiéry J; Perrin N
Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):674-83. PubMed ID: 19087183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Females prefer the scent of outbred males: good-genes-as-heterozygosity?
Ilmonen P; Stundner G; Thoss M; Penn DJ
BMC Evol Biol; 2009 May; 9():104. PubMed ID: 19445699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Bigger Is Not Always Better: Females Prefer Males of Mean Body Size in Philautus odontotarsus.
Zhu B; Wang J; Zhao L; Sun Z; Brauth SE; Tang Y; Cui J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149879. PubMed ID: 26901766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Individual mating success, lek stability, and the neglected limitations of statistical power.
Kokko H; Sutherland WJ; LindstrÖm J; Reynolds JD; Mackenzie A
Anim Behav; 1998 Sep; 56(3):755-612. PubMed ID: 9784227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genotype-by-environment interactions for precopulatory mate guarding in a lek-mating insect.
Vellnow N; Schindler S; Schmoll T
Ecol Evol; 2020 Nov; 10(21):12138-12146. PubMed ID: 33209276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Microsatellite analysis of female mating behaviour in lek-breeding sage grouse.
Semple K; Wayne RK; Gibson RM
Mol Ecol; 2001 Aug; 10(8):2043-8. PubMed ID: 11555247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. INTERSEXUAL SELECTION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN FRUIT FLY: DOES FEMALE CHOICE ENHANCE FITNESS?
Whittier TS; Kaneshiro KY
Evolution; 1995 Oct; 49(5):990-996. PubMed ID: 28564862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Physiological costs enforce the honesty of lek display in the black grouse (Tetrao tetrix).
Lebigre C; Alatalo RV; Siitari H
Oecologia; 2013 Aug; 172(4):983-93. PubMed ID: 23266713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Glucocorticoid-Mediated Changes in Male Green Treefrog Vocalizations Alter Attractiveness to Females.
Leary CJ; Crocker-Buta S; Holloway A; Kennedy JGC
Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Jul; 61(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33940612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diversity of compounds in femoral secretions of Galápagos iguanas (genera:
Ibáñez A; Menke M; Quezada G; Jiménez-Uzcátegui G; Schulz S; Steinfartz S
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3689. PubMed ID: 28828277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Do male moor frogs (Rana arvalis) lek with kin?
Knopp T; Heimovirta M; Kokko H; Merilä J
Mol Ecol; 2008 May; 17(10):2522-30. PubMed ID: 18422930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Female mating tactics in lekking fallow deer (Dama dama): experience explains inter-individual variability more than costs.
Imperio S; Lombardi S; De Marinis A; Ronchi F; Santini G; Focardi S
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):3598. PubMed ID: 32108140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]