97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3717024)
1. Comparison of coupling intervals that induce clinical and nonclinical forms of ventricular tachycardia during programmed stimulation.
Morady F; DiCarlo LA; Baerman JM; de Buitleir M
Am J Cardiol; 1986 Jun; 57(15):1269-73. PubMed ID: 3717024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immediate reproducibility of clinical and nonclinical forms of induced ventricular tachycardia.
de Buitleir M; Morady F; DiCarlo LA; Baerman JM; Krol RB
Am J Cardiol; 1986 Aug; 58(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 3739917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of high stimulation current on the induction of ventricular tachycardia.
Morady F; Dicarlo LA; Liem LB; Krol RB; Baerman JM
Am J Cardiol; 1985 Jul; 56(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 4014043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective comparison of programmed ventricular stimulation with triple extrastimuli versus single and double extrastimuli during infusion of isoproterenol.
Baerman JM; Morady F; de Buitleir M; DiCarlo LA; Kou WH; Nelson SD
Am Heart J; 1989 Feb; 117(2):342-7. PubMed ID: 2644794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Induction of ventricular fibrillation versus monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during programmed stimulation. Role of premature beat conduction delay.
Avitall B; McKinnie J; Jazayeri M; Akhtar M; Anderson AJ; Tchou P
Circulation; 1992 Apr; 85(4):1271-8. PubMed ID: 1372847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of programmed stimulation methods in the evaluation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients 20 years old and younger.
Silka MJ; Kron J; Cutler JE; McAnulty JH
Am J Cardiol; 1990 Oct; 66(10):826-30. PubMed ID: 2220580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sequelae of nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia induced during programmed ventricular stimulation.
Kou WH; de Buitleir M; Kadish AH; Morady F
Am J Cardiol; 1989 Nov; 64(18):1148-51. PubMed ID: 2816767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of clinical ventricular tachycardia using programmed stimulation: value of third and fourth extrastimuli.
Mann DE; Luck JC; Griffin JC; Herre JM; Limacher MC; Magro SA; Robertson NW; Wyndham CR
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Sep; 52(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 6613871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-current stimuli to the spared epicardium of a large infarct induce ventricular tachycardia.
Kavanagh KM; Kabas JS; Rollins DL; Melnick SB; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Circulation; 1992 Feb; 85(2):680-98. PubMed ID: 1735161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of drive cycle length during programmed stimulation on induction of ventricular arrhythmias: analysis of 403 patients.
Estes NA; Garan H; McGovern B; Ruskin JN
Am J Cardiol; 1986 Jan; 57(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 3942052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Programmed ventricular stimulation using up to two extrastimuli and repetition of double extrastimulation for induction of ventricular tachycardia: a new highly sensitive and specific protocol.
Belhassen B; Shapira I; Sheps D; Laniado S
Am J Cardiol; 1990 Mar; 65(9):615-22. PubMed ID: 2309631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of basic drive cycle length on the yield of ventricular tachycardia during programmed ventricular stimulation.
Summitt J; Rosenheck S; Kou WH; Schmaltz S; Kadish AH; Morady F
Am J Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 65(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 2294680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lack of benefit of very short basic drive train cycle length or repetition of extrastimulus coupling intervals for induction of ventricular tachycardia.
Lee CS; Wan SH; Cooper MJ; Ross DL
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Jun; 9(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 9654221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing the yield of ventricular tachycardia induction: a prospective, randomized comparative study of the standard ventricular stimulation protocol to a short-to-long protocol and a new two-site protocol.
Simonson JS; Gang ES; Mandel W; Peter T
Am Heart J; 1991 Jan; 121(1 Pt 1):68-76. PubMed ID: 1985380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results and efficiency of programmed ventricular stimulation with four extrastimuli compared with one, two, and three extrastimuli.
Hummel JD; Strickberger SA; Daoud E; Niebauer M; Bakr O; Man KC; Williamson BD; Morady F
Circulation; 1994 Dec; 90(6):2827-32. PubMed ID: 7994827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective comparison of a conventional and an accelerated protocol for programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with coronary artery disease.
Morady F; Kadish A; de Buitleir M; Kou WH; Calkins H; Schmaltz S; Rosenheck S; Sousa J
Circulation; 1991 Mar; 83(3):764-73. PubMed ID: 1999027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of the cycle length of basic drive on induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease.
Breithardt G; Borggrefe M; Podczeck A; Budde T
Am J Cardiol; 1987 Dec; 60(16):1306-10. PubMed ID: 3687781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Resetting response patterns during sustained ventricular tachycardia: relationship to the excitable gap.
Almendral JM; Stamato NJ; Rosenthal ME; Marchlinski FE; Miller JM; Josephson ME
Circulation; 1986 Oct; 74(4):722-30. PubMed ID: 3757186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determinants of induced sustained arrhythmias in survivors of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation.
Swerdlow CD; Bardy GH; McAnulty J; Kron J; Lee JT; Graham E; Peterson J; Greene HL
Circulation; 1987 Nov; 76(5):1053-60. PubMed ID: 3664993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of programmed ventricular stimulation in presumed carotid sinus syndrome.
Nelson SD; Kou WH; De Buitleir M; DiCarlo LA; Morady F
Am J Cardiol; 1987 Nov; 60(13):1073-7. PubMed ID: 3673909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
