These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37171024)

  • 1. Validation of the g.tec Unicorn Hybrid Black wireless EEG system.
    Pontifex MB; Coffman CA
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Sep; 60(9):e14320. PubMed ID: 37171024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test-Retest Reliability of Time-Domain EEG Features to Assess Cognitive Load Using a Wireless Dry-Electrode System.
    Ortiz O; Blustein D; Kuruganti U
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():2885-2888. PubMed ID: 33018609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recording human electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for neuroscientific research and real-time functional cortical mapping.
    Hill NJ; Gupta D; Brunner P; Gunduz A; Adamo MA; Ritaccio A; Schalk G
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Jun; (64):. PubMed ID: 22782131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a wireless dry electrode system for electroencephalography.
    Wyckoff SN; Sherlin LH; Ford NL; Dalke D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Oct; 12():95. PubMed ID: 26520574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between a wireless dry electrode EEG system with a conventional wired wet electrode EEG system for clinical applications.
    Hinrichs H; Scholz M; Baum AK; Kam JWY; Knight RT; Heinze HJ
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):5218. PubMed ID: 32251333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. P300 speller BCI with a mobile EEG system: comparison to a traditional amplifier.
    De Vos M; Kroesen M; Emkes R; Debener S
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Jun; 11(3):036008. PubMed ID: 24763067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High and dry? Comparing active dry EEG electrodes to active and passive wet electrodes.
    Mathewson KE; Harrison TJ; Kizuk SA
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jan; 54(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 28000254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic comparison between a wireless EEG system with dry electrodes and a wired EEG system with wet electrodes.
    Kam JWY; Griffin S; Shen A; Patel S; Hinrichs H; Heinze HJ; Deouell LY; Knight RT
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():119-129. PubMed ID: 30218769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of electrical potential sensors and Ag/AgCl electrodes for characterising spontaneous and event related electroencephalagram signals.
    Fatoorechi M; Parkinson J; Prance RJ; Prance H; Seth AK; Schwartzman DJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Aug; 251():7-16. PubMed ID: 25936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A dry electrode for EEG recording.
    Taheri BA; Knight RT; Smith RL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 90(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 7514984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Dry EEG-System for Scientific Research and Brain-Computer Interfaces.
    Zander TO; Lehne M; Ihme K; Jatzev S; Correia J; Kothe C; Picht B; Nijboer F
    Front Neurosci; 2011; 5():53. PubMed ID: 21647345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of a Low-Cost EEG Monitoring System and Dry Electrodes toward Clinical Use in the Neonatal ICU.
    O'Sullivan M; Temko A; Bocchino A; O'Mahony C; Boylan G; Popovici E
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jun; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 31212613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Multichannel EEG Acquisition System With Novel Ag NWs/PDMS Flexible Dry Electrodes.
    Wang Z; Chen C; Li W; Yuan W; Han T; Sun C; Tao L; Zhao Y; Chen W
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():1299-1302. PubMed ID: 30440629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative evaluation of signal quality between a research-grade and a wireless dry-electrode mobile EEG system.
    Marini F; Lee C; Wagner J; Makeig S; Gola M
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Sep; 16(5):054001. PubMed ID: 31096191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A high-density 256-channel cap for dry electroencephalography.
    Fiedler P; Fonseca C; Supriyanto E; Zanow F; Haueisen J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Mar; 43(4):1295-1308. PubMed ID: 34796574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new EEG recording system for passive dry electrodes.
    Gargiulo G; Calvo RA; Bifulco P; Cesarelli M; Jin C; Mohamed A; van Schaik A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 May; 121(5):686-93. PubMed ID: 20097606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acquiring research-grade ERPs on a shoestring budget: A comparison of a modified Emotiv and commercial SynAmps EEG system.
    Barham MP; Clark GM; Hayden MJ; Enticott PG; Conduit R; Lum JAG
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Sep; 54(9):1393-1404. PubMed ID: 28497557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel Multipin Electrode Cap System for Dry Electroencephalography.
    Fiedler P; Pedrosa P; Griebel S; Fonseca C; Vaz F; Supriyanto E; Zanow F; Haueisen J
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Sep; 28(5):647-656. PubMed ID: 25998854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Current-based EEG Amplifier and Validation with a Saline Phantom and an SSVEP Paradigm.
    Comaduran Marquez D; Anderson SJ; Hecker KG; Murari K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2024 Sep; PP():. PubMed ID: 39240745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of Soft Multipin Dry EEG Electrodes.
    Heijs JJA; Havelaar RJ; Fiedler P; van Wezel RJA; Heida T
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(20):. PubMed ID: 34696039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.