These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37171039)

  • 1. Plaque accumulation on the fitting surface of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses with contact or noncontact pontics: A split mouth randomized controlled trial.
    Gong Z; Lin Y; Di P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Oct; 35(7):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 37171039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Plaque accumulation at the fitting surface and cleaning status in patients with full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: a cross sectional study].
    Gong ZJ; Lin Y; Xu TS; Xu D; Di P
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 56(11):1074-1079. PubMed ID: 34763401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of Prosthesis Design on the Outcomes of Tooth Implants Immediately Placed and Loaded by Means of One-Piece Titanium Machined Restoration.
    Toti P; Marconcini S; Enrica G; Pedretti G; Barone A; Covani U
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Apr; 44(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 29182488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immediate vs conventional loading of variable-thread tapered implants supporting three- to four-unit fixed partial dentures in the posterior maxilla: 1-year interim results of a split-mouth randomised controlled trial.
    Abi-Aad H; Daher F; Dimassi H; Cordioli G; Majzoub Z
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(3):337-350. PubMed ID: 30246186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immediate occluding definitive partial fixed prosthesis versus non-occluding provisional restorations - 4-month post-loading results from a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial.
    Heinemann F; Grufferty B; Papavasiliou G; Dominiak M; García JJ; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 27022636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate versus conventional loading with fixed full-arch prostheses in mandibles with failing dentition: a prospective controlled study.
    Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Covani U; Peñarrocha M; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):427-34. PubMed ID: 25830404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seven-Year Follow-up of Full-Arch Prostheses Supported by Four Implants: A Prospective Study.
    Ayub KV; Ayub EA; Lins do Valle A; Bonfante G; Pegoraro T; Fernando L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1351-1358. PubMed ID: 29140379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediately loaded distally cantilevered fixed mandibular prostheses supported by four implants placed in both in fresh extraction and healed sites: 2-year results from a prospective study.
    Krennmair S; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Krennmair G; Piehslinger E
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 24977253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immediate versus conventional loading of variable-thread tapered implants supporting three- to four-unit fixed partial dentures in the posterior maxilla: 3-year results of a split-mouth randomised controlled trial.
    Daher FI; Abi-Aad HL; Dimassi HI; Cordioli G; Majzoub ZAK
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(4):449-466. PubMed ID: 31781699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate loading of two (fixed-on-2) versus three (fixed-on-3) implants placed flapless supporting cross-arch fixed prostheses: One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Loi I; Viola P; Ferri V; Leone M; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9 Suppl 1(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 27314120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate loading of fixed cross-arch prostheses supported by flapless-placed supershort or long implants: 1-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Felice P; Buti J; Leone M; Ferri V; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 25738177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complete Edentulous Rehabilitation Using an Immediate Function Protocol and an Implant Design Featuring a Straight Body, Anodically Oxidized Surface, and Narrow Tip with Engaging Threads Extending to the Apex of the Implant: A 5-year Retrospective Clinical Study.
    Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Lopes A; Ferro A; Gravito I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 26800172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? Four-month post-loading preliminary results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Luongo G; Bressan E; Grusovin MG; d'Avenia F; Neumann K; Sbricoli L; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 26021224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of peri-implant submucosal microbiota in arches with zirconia or titanium implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Jia P; Yang J; Yue Z; Liu J; Liu Q; Liu Z; Tang L; Hou J
    Trials; 2020 Nov; 21(1):979. PubMed ID: 33246481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate loading of three (fixed-on-3) vs four (fixed-on-4) implants supporting cross-arch fixed prostheses: 1-year results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Cannizzaro G; Cavallari M; Lazzarini M; Purello D'ambrosio G; Scialpi G; Audino S; Velasco-Ortega E; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(3):323-333. PubMed ID: 30246185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of 4- or 6-implant supported immediate full-arch fixed prostheses: A retrospective cohort study of 217 patients followed up for 3-13 years.
    Zhang Y; Li S; Di P; Zhang Y; Wu A; Lin Y
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 25(2):381-397. PubMed ID: 36522852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized controlled clinical trial of edentulous patients treated with immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular fixed prostheses.
    Alfadda SA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):806-16. PubMed ID: 23506407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbiological and clinical evaluation of ultrasonic debridement with/without erythritol air polishing during supportive periodontal therapy in arches with full-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Yang J; Jia P; Yue Z; Liu J; Liu Z; Tang L; Liu Q; Hou J
    BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e053286. PubMed ID: 34876432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Titanium versus zirconia complete arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: A comparison of plaque accumulation.
    Curiel-Aguilera FP; Griffiths GR; Rossmann JA; Gonzalez JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):369-375. PubMed ID: 34879988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full-Arch, Screw-Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study.
    Drago C
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):402-408. PubMed ID: 27416302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.