154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37171117)
21. Craniofacial sutures: Signaling centres integrating mechanosensation, cell signaling, and cell differentiation.
Roth DM; Souter K; Graf D
Eur J Cell Biol; 2022; 101(3):151258. PubMed ID: 35908436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Skeletal stem and progenitor cells maintain cranial suture patency and prevent craniosynostosis.
Menon S; Salhotra A; Shailendra S; Tevlin R; Ransom RC; Januszyk M; Chan CKF; Behr B; Wan DC; Longaker MT; Quarto N
Nat Commun; 2021 Jul; 12(1):4640. PubMed ID: 34330896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Msx2 gene dosage influences the number of proliferative osteogenic cells in growth centers of the developing murine skull: a possible mechanism for MSX2-mediated craniosynostosis in humans.
Liu YH; Tang Z; Kundu RK; Wu L; Luo W; Zhu D; Sangiorgi F; Snead ML; Maxson RE
Dev Biol; 1999 Jan; 205(2):260-74. PubMed ID: 9917362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A new mathematical model for pattern formation by cranial sutures.
Yoshimura K; Kobayashi R; Ohmura T; Kajimoto Y; Miura T
J Theor Biol; 2016 Nov; 408():66-74. PubMed ID: 27519950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of RANK-RANKL-OPG axis in cranial suture homeostasis.
Lee JC; Spiguel L; Shenaq DS; Zhong M; Wietholt C; He TC; Reid RR
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):699-705. PubMed ID: 21415639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. BMP-IHH-mediated interplay between mesenchymal stem cells and osteoclasts supports calvarial bone homeostasis and repair.
Guo Y; Yuan Y; Wu L; Ho TV; Jing J; Sugii H; Li J; Han X; Feng J; Guo C; Chai Y
Bone Res; 2018; 6():30. PubMed ID: 30345151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Regulation of cranial suture morphogenesis.
Ogle RC; Tholpady SS; McGlynn KA; Ogle RA
Cells Tissues Organs; 2004; 176(1-3):54-66. PubMed ID: 14745235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Transforming growth factor-beta 2 and TGF-beta 3 regulate fetal rat cranial suture morphogenesis by regulating rates of cell proliferation and apoptosis.
Opperman LA; Adab K; Gakunga PT
Dev Dyn; 2000 Oct; 219(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 11002343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sutures Possess Strong Regenerative Capacity for Calvarial Bone Injury.
Park S; Zhao H; Urata M; Chai Y
Stem Cells Dev; 2016 Dec; 25(23):1801-1807. PubMed ID: 27762665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mice lacking the conserved transcription factor Grainyhead-like 3 (Grhl3) display increased apposition of the frontal and parietal bones during embryonic development.
Goldie SJ; Arhatari BD; Anderson P; Auden A; Partridge DD; Jane SM; Dworkin S
BMC Dev Biol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):37. PubMed ID: 27756203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cranial deformation in craniosynostosis. A new explanation.
Delashaw JB; Persing JA; Jane JA
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 1991 Jul; 2(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 1821307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: insights from human genetics and experimental studies.
Morriss-Kay GM; Wilkie AO
J Anat; 2005 Nov; 207(5):637-53. PubMed ID: 16313397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correction of coronal suture synostosis using suture and dura mater allografts in rabbits with familial craniosynostosis.
Mooney MP; Burrows AM; Smith TD; Losken HW; Opperman LA; Dechant J; Kreithen AM; Kapucu R; Cooper GM; Ogle RC; Siegel MI
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 May; 38(3):206-25. PubMed ID: 11386428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differential activation of canonical Wnt signaling determines cranial sutures fate: a novel mechanism for sagittal suture craniosynostosis.
Behr B; Longaker MT; Quarto N
Dev Biol; 2010 Aug; 344(2):922-40. PubMed ID: 20547147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dysregulated PDGFRα signaling alters coronal suture morphogenesis and leads to craniosynostosis through endochondral ossification.
He F; Soriano P
Development; 2017 Nov; 144(21):4026-4036. PubMed ID: 28947535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The BMP antagonist noggin regulates cranial suture fusion.
Warren SM; Brunet LJ; Harland RM; Economides AN; Longaker MT
Nature; 2003 Apr; 422(6932):625-9. PubMed ID: 12687003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Immunolocalization of transforming growth factor beta 1, beta 2, and beta 3 and insulin-like growth factor I in premature cranial suture fusion.
Roth DA; Gold LI; Han VK; McCarthy JG; Sung JJ; Wisoff JH; Longaker MT
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Feb; 99(2):300-9; discussion 310-6. PubMed ID: 9030135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Apoptosis in murine calvarial bone and suture development.
Rice DP; Kim HJ; Thesleff I
Eur J Oral Sci; 1999 Aug; 107(4):265-75. PubMed ID: 10467942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cranial sutures require tissue interactions with dura mater to resist osseous obliteration in vitro.
Opperman LA; Passarelli RW; Morgan EP; Reintjes M; Ogle RC
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1978-87. PubMed ID: 8619379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Mohawk homeobox gene represents a marker and osteo-inhibitory factor in calvarial suture osteoprogenitor cells.
Wang Y; Qin Q; Wang Z; Negri S; Sono T; Tower RJ; Li Z; Xing X; Archer M; Thottappillil N; Zhu M; Suarez A; Kim DH; Harvey T; Fan CM; James AW
Cell Death Dis; 2024 Jun; 15(6):420. PubMed ID: 38886383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
