BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37171873)

  • 1. Effect of Recent Abortion Legislation on Twitter User Engagement, Sentiment, and Expressions of Trust in Clinicians and Privacy of Health Information: Content Analysis.
    Swanson K; Ravi A; Saleh S; Weia B; Pleasants E; Arvisais-Anhalt S
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e46655. PubMed ID: 37171873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
    Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
    JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining ethno-racial attitudes of the public in Twitter discourses related to the United States Supreme Court
    Ujah OI; Olaore P; Nnorom OC; Ogbu CE; Kirby RS
    Front Glob Womens Health; 2023; 4():1149441. PubMed ID: 37214560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examination of the Public's Reaction on Twitter to the Over-Turning of Roe v Wade and Abortion Bans.
    Mane H; Yue X; Yu W; Doig AC; Wei H; Delcid N; Harris AG; Nguyen TT; Nguyen QC
    Healthcare (Basel); 2022 Nov; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 36553914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion pill marketing and sourcing on twitter following Dobbs v. Jackson supreme court ruling.
    McMann TJ; Haupt MR; Le N; Meurice ME; Li J; Cuomo RE; Mackey TK
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2024 May; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 38780176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential Effects of
    Hall TS
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):359-373. PubMed ID: 38344784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.
    Zhu DT; Zhao L; Alzoubi T; Shenin N; Baskaran T; Tikhonov J; Wang C
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0288947. PubMed ID: 38551970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geographic Differences in Cannabis Conversations on Twitter: Infodemiology Study.
    van Draanen J; Tao H; Gupta S; Liu S
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2020 Oct; 6(4):e18540. PubMed ID: 33016888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the
    Jozkowski KN; Bueno X; Turner RC; Crawford BL; Lo WJ
    Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2233794. PubMed ID: 37565622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Critical Analysis of
    Manninen BA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):357-367. PubMed ID: 36647699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. INTRODUCTION: Securing Reproductive Justice After
    Ahmed A; Huberfeld N; McClain LC
    J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 38088627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association Between Restricted Abortion Access and Child Entries Into the Foster Care System.
    Adkins S; Talmor N; White MH; Dutton C; O'Donoghue AL
    JAMA Pediatr; 2024 Jan; 178(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 37930718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of a US Supreme Court ruling to restrict abortion rights.
    Clark CS; Paluck EL; Westwood SJ; Sen M; Malhotra N; Jessee S
    Nat Hum Behav; 2024 Jan; 8(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 37945806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimated Travel Time and Spatial Access to Abortion Facilities in the US Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Decision.
    Rader B; Upadhyay UD; Sehgal NKR; Reis BY; Brownstein JS; Hswen Y
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(20):2041-2047. PubMed ID: 36318194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The state of abortion rights in the US.
    Davis MF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):324-329. PubMed ID: 35975678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Natural Language Processing to Explore Social Media Opinions on Food Security: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study.
    Molenaar A; Lukose D; Brennan L; Jenkins EL; McCaffrey TA
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Mar; 26():e47826. PubMed ID: 38512326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.
    Harrison LK; Naylor KL
    Nurse Pract; 1991 Dec; 16(12):53-9. PubMed ID: 1798604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.
    Byron JJ; Avalos M; Xiao KA; Klein AA; Leheste JR
    Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32100. PubMed ID: 36601141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.