These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37172414)

  • 1. Delta-band neural envelope tracking predicts speech intelligibility in noise in preschoolers.
    Van Hirtum T; Somers B; Verschueren E; Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2023 Jul; 434():108785. PubMed ID: 37172414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural envelope tracking predicts speech intelligibility and hearing aid benefit in children with hearing loss.
    Van Hirtum T; Somers B; Dieudonné B; Verschueren E; Wouters J; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108893. PubMed ID: 37806102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural tracking of speech envelope does not unequivocally reflect intelligibility.
    Kösem A; Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P
    Neuroimage; 2023 May; 272():120040. PubMed ID: 36935084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of stimulus intensity on neural envelope tracking.
    Verschueren E; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108175. PubMed ID: 33494033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech Intelligibility for Target and Masker with Different Spectra.
    Leclère T; Théry D; Lavandier M; Culling JF
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():257-266. PubMed ID: 27080666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting individual speech intelligibility from the cortical tracking of acoustic- and phonetic-level speech representations.
    Lesenfants D; Vanthornhout J; Verschueren E; Decruy L; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():1-9. PubMed ID: 31167150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural tracking measures of speech intelligibility: Manipulating intelligibility while keeping acoustics unchanged.
    Karunathilake IMD; Kulasingham JP; Simon JZ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Dec; 120(49):e2309166120. PubMed ID: 38032934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural Speech Tracking in the Theta and in the Delta Frequency Band Differentially Encode Clarity and Comprehension of Speech in Noise.
    Etard O; Reichenbach T
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(29):5750-5759. PubMed ID: 31109963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phase-locking of Neural Activity to the Envelope of Speech in the Delta Frequency Band Reflects Differences between Word Lists and Sentences.
    Mohammadi Y; Graversen C; Østergaard J; Andersen OK; Reichenbach T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2023 Aug; 35(8):1301-1311. PubMed ID: 37379482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Stimulus Choice on an EEG-Based Objective Measure of Speech Intelligibility.
    Verschueren E; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1586-1597. PubMed ID: 33136634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two stages of speech envelope tracking in human auditory cortex modulated by speech intelligibility.
    Xu N; Zhao B; Luo L; Zhang K; Shao X; Luan G; Wang Q; Hu W; Wang Q
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Feb; 33(5):2215-2228. PubMed ID: 35695785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test of Spanish sentences to measure speech intelligibility in noise conditions.
    Cervera T; González-Alvarez J
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Jun; 43(2):459-67. PubMed ID: 21416305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterizing Speech Intelligibility in Noise After Wide Dynamic Range Compression.
    Rhebergen KS; Maalderink TH; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 27749521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contributions of listening effort and intelligibility to cortical tracking of speech in adverse listening conditions.
    Ershaid H; Lizarazu M; McLaughlin D; Cooke M; Simantiraki O; Koutsogiannaki M; Lallier M
    Cortex; 2024 Mar; 172():54-71. PubMed ID: 38215511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural Tracking Measures of Speech Intelligibility: Manipulating Intelligibility while Keeping Acoustics Unchanged.
    Karunathilake IMD; Kulasingham JP; Simon JZ
    bioRxiv; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37292644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.