These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37172416)

  • 1. Predictors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed initial TESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang F; Dai M; Yang X; Cheng Y; Ye L; Huang W; Chen X; Yin T; Sha Y
    Andrology; 2024 Jan; 12(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 37172416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review.
    Deruyver Y; Vanderschueren D; Van der Aa F
    Andrology; 2014 Jan; 2(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 24193894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors for successful sperm retrieval of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE) following failed TESE in nonobstructive azoospermia patients.
    Xu T; Peng L; Lin X; Li J; Xu W
    Andrologia; 2017 May; 49(4):. PubMed ID: 27444399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive factors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed mTESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Long-term experience at a single institute.
    Yücel C; Budak S; Keskin MZ; Kisa E; Kozacioglu Z
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2018 Jun; 90(2):136-140. PubMed ID: 29974724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrasurgical parameters associated with successful sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction.
    Caroppo E; Castiglioni F; Campagna C; Colpi EM; Piatti E; Gazzano G; Colpi GM
    Andrology; 2021 Nov; 9(6):1864-1871. PubMed ID: 34289247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes and predictive factors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed classic TESE: results from a multicenter cross-sectional study.
    Boeri L; Bebi C; Dente D; Greco E; Turetti M; Capece M; Cocci A; Cito G; Preto M; Pescatori E; Ciampaglia W; Scroppo FI; Falcone M; Ceruti C; Gadda F; Franco G; Dehò F; Palmieri A; Rolle L; Gontero P; Montorsi F; Montanari E; Salonia A
    Int J Impot Res; 2022 Dec; 34(8):795-799. PubMed ID: 34743195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical comparison between conventional and microdissection testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia: Understanding which treatment works for which patient.
    Maglia E; Boeri L; Fontana M; Gallioli A; De Lorenzis E; Palmisano F; Zanetti S; Sampogna G; Restelli L; Somigliana E; Serrago M; Gadda F; Montanari E
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2018 Jun; 90(2):130-135. PubMed ID: 29974723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive value of FSH, testicular volume, and histopathological findings for the sperm retrieval rate of microdissection TESE in nonobstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis.
    Li H; Chen LP; Yang J; Li MC; Chen RB; Lan RZ; Wang SG; Liu JH; Wang T
    Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 28361811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nomogram based on a circular RNA biomarker for predicting the likelihood of successful sperm retrieval
    Shi S; Wang T; Wang L; Wang M
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():1109807. PubMed ID: 36733803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Salvage micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction; outcome in men with non-obstructive azoospermia with previous failed sperm retrievals.
    Kalsi JS; Shah P; Thum Y; Muneer A; Ralph DJ; Minhas S
    BJU Int; 2015 Sep; 116(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 25220441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE): Predictive value of preoperative hormonal levels and pathology in non-obstructive azoospermia.
    Eken A; Gulec F
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2018 Feb; 34(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 29413225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histological and immunohistochemical outcomes after microdissection TESE in contrast with hormonal profile, testis volume and genetics in patients with azoospermia.
    Arian I; Dumbraveanu I; Ghenciu V; Machidon D; Ernu I; Ceban E
    J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 36873127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcomes in azoospermic patients with bilateral orchidopexy.
    Arasteh H; Gilani MAS; Ramezani-Binabaj M; Babaei M
    Andrology; 2024 Jan; 12(1):157-163. PubMed ID: 37210678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testicular histopathology as a predictor of a positive sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.
    Abdel Raheem A; Garaffa G; Rushwan N; De Luca F; Zacharakis E; Abdel Raheem T; Freeman A; Serhal P; Harper JC; Ralph D
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):492-9. PubMed ID: 22583840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conventional testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and non-obstructive azoospermia: is there still a chance in the era of microdissection TESE? Results from a single non-academic community hospital.
    Saccà A; Pastore AL; Roscigno M; Naspro R; Pellucchi F; Fuschi A; Maruccia S; Territo A; Pisano F; Zanga L; Capitanio E; Carbone A; Fusi F; Chinaglia D; Da Pozzo LF
    Andrology; 2016 May; 4(3):425-9. PubMed ID: 26872565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Salvage hormonal therapy after failed microdissection testicular sperm extraction: A multi-institutional prospective study.
    Shiraishi K; Ishikawa T; Watanabe N; Iwamoto T; Matsuyama H
    Int J Urol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):496-500. PubMed ID: 26989893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testicular histology may predict the successful sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing conventional TESE: a diagnostic accuracy study.
    Caroppo E; Colpi EM; Gazzano G; Vaccalluzzo L; Scroppo FI; D'Amato G; Colpi GM
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Jan; 34(1):149-154. PubMed ID: 27655389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The association between serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels and the success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with azoospermia.
    Yildirim ME; Koc A; Kaygusuz IC; Badem H; Karatas OF; Cimentepe E; Unal D
    Urol J; 2014 Sep; 11(4):1825-8. PubMed ID: 25194084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Versus Multiple Needle-pass Percutaneous Testicular Sperm Aspiration in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jensen CFS; Ohl DA; Fode M; Jørgensen N; Giwercman A; Bruun NH; Elenkov A; Klajnbard A; Andersen CY; Aksglaede L; Grøndahl ML; Bekker MC; Sønksen J
    Eur Urol; 2022 Oct; 82(4):377-384. PubMed ID: 35599183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Severe testicular atrophy does not affect the success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction.
    Bryson CF; Ramasamy R; Sheehan M; Palermo GD; Rosenwaks Z; Schlegel PN
    J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):175-8. PubMed ID: 23911635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.