BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3717244)

  • 21. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contribution of endocervical curettage in evaluating abnormal cervical cytology.
    Drescher CW; Peters WA; Roberts JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 6877690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Endocervical curettage: does it contribute to the management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology?
    Oyer R; Hanjani P
    Gynecol Oncol; 1986 Oct; 25(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 3758830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
    Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Laser miniconization in mild and moderate dysplasia of the uterine cervix.
    Bekassy Z; Alm P; Grundsell H; Larsson G; Astedt B
    Gynecol Oncol; 1983 Jun; 15(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 6862291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing visual inspection with acetic acid plus random cervical biopsy plus endocervical curettage to colposcopic directed biopsy plus endocervical curettage in detecting cervical lesions in low-resource settings.
    Puntachai P; Darojn D; Chumworathayi B; Chaousriku W
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2665-8. PubMed ID: 22320971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Endocervical curettage. Its use in the colposcopic assessment of a patient who has an abnormal cervico-vaginal smear].
    Bergeron C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1990; 19(8):989-94. PubMed ID: 2081876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Endocervical curettage. Does it contribute to the management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology?
    Irvin W; Flora S; Andersen W; Stoler M; Taylor P; Rice L
    J Reprod Med; 2004 Jan; 49(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 14976787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of the diagnosis in suspected intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix.
    Myllynen L; Karjalainen O
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 6732157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The utility of endocervical curettage: does routine ECC at the time of colposcopy for low-grade cytologic abnormalities improve diagnosis of high-grade disease?
    Rose JD; Byun SY; Sims SM; Davis JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):530.e1-3. PubMed ID: 22541611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Endocervical curettage at the time of colposcopic assessment of the uterine cervix.
    Abu J; Davies Q
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2005 May; 60(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 15841025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Management of the abnormal Papanicolaou smear and colposcopy in pregnancy: an evidenced-based review.
    Fleury AC; Birsner ML; Fader AN
    Minerva Ginecol; 2012 Apr; 64(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 22481624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Colposcopic evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Cruikshank DP; Kaminsky DB; Ekbladh LE
    J Reprod Med; 1976 Dec; 17(6):327-30. PubMed ID: 1003398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diagnostic conization of the cervix: review of 460 consecutive cases.
    Killackey MA; Jones WB; Lewis JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jun; 67(6):766-70. PubMed ID: 3703403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of abnormal cervical cytology.
    Ronk DA; Jimerson GK; Merrill JA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 May; 49(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 850574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Role of microcolposcopy in the diagnostic evaluation of cervical pre-invasive lesions.
    Pasetto N; Piccione E; Sesti F
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1991 Mar; 34(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 1673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Management of the abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Frisch LE
    J Am Coll Health; 1989 May; 37(6):279-82. PubMed ID: 2723260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Follow-up Papanicolaou smear for cervical atypia: are we missing significant disease? A HARNET Study.
    Slawson DC; Bennett JH; Herman JM
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Mar; 36(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 8454975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
    Milojković M; Makarović Z; Pajtler M
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.