These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Optotype and grating visual acuity in preschool children. Stiers P; Vanderkelen R; Vandenbussche E Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 44(9):4123-30. PubMed ID: 12939336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Visual acuity study in the child 18 months to 2 years old]. Albouy RP Oftalmologia; 1994; 38(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 8155626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of visual acuity measured with Allen figures and Snellen letters using the B-VAT II monitor. Lueder GT; Garibaldi D Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1758-61. PubMed ID: 9373103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A new optotype chart for detection of nonorganic visual loss. Mojon DS; Flueckiger P Ophthalmology; 2002 Apr; 109(4):810-5. PubMed ID: 11927447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Event-Related Potentials Allow for Optotype-Based Objective Acuity Estimation. Heinrich SP; Lüth I; Bach M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(4):2184-91. PubMed ID: 25744983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Freiburg Acuity Test in Preschool Children: Testability, Test-Retest Variability, and Comparison With LEA Symbols. Farassat N; Jehle V; Heinrich SP; Lagrèze WA; Bach M Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 13(3):14. PubMed ID: 38502142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Parent-administered visual acuity testing: is it reliable and can it improve office efficiency? Paysse EA; Camejo L; Hussein MA; Coats DK J AAPOS; 2004 Aug; 8(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 15314593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing. Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M; Kunawut C; Masayaanon P Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 14516806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vanishing optotypes. New type of acuity test letters. Frisén L Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Aug; 104(8):1194-8. PubMed ID: 3741251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Visual acuity of the preschool child: a review. Fern KD; Manny RE Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 May; 63(5):319-45. PubMed ID: 3717284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Vanishing optotypes: is single presentation superior to chart exposure? Simas ML; Silva SL Braz J Med Biol Res; 1991; 24(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 1823226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of a visual acuity test using closed Landolt-Cs to determine malingering. Kröger N; Jürgens C; Kohlmann T; Tost F Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 255(12):2459-2465. PubMed ID: 29046952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Crowding in children's visual acuity tests--effect of test design and age. Norgett Y; Siderov J Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):920-7. PubMed ID: 21532515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital visual acuity test using calculator-type numerals with geometric gradation. Lewis JM; Smith TJ Ophthalmology; 1987 Feb; 94(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 3574877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. New acuity test for toddlers. Woodhouse JM; Adoh TO; Oduwaiye KA; Batchelor BG; Megji S; Unwin N; Jones N Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Apr; 12(2):249-51. PubMed ID: 1408183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An automated visual acuity testing computer program using the Apple II system. Friendly DS; Weiss IP Am J Ophthalmol; 1985 Feb; 99(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 3838219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Glasgow Acuity Cards: a new test for the measurement of letter acuity in children. McGraw PV; Winn B Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Oct; 13(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 8278195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?]. Becker R; Gräf M Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16418930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]