136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37173032)
1. Tackling the challenge of drying and redispersion of cellulose nanofibrils via membrane-facilitated liquid phase exchange.
Onyianta AJ; Xu G; Etale A; Eloi JC; Eichhorn SJ
Carbohydr Polym; 2023 Aug; 314():120943. PubMed ID: 37173032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of hemicellulose hydrolysate addition on the dehydration and redispersion characteristic of cellulose nanofibrils.
Kim J; Kim J; Jung S; Yun H; Won S; Choi IG; Kwak HW
Carbohydr Polym; 2024 Jun; 334():122036. PubMed ID: 38553234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Poly (vinyl alcohol) as a capping agent in oven dried cellulose nanofibrils.
Velásquez-Cock J; Gómez H BE; Posada P; Serpa G A; Gómez H C; Castro C; Gañán P; Zuluaga R
Carbohydr Polym; 2018 Jan; 179():118-125. PubMed ID: 29111034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mixed-linkage (1,3;1,4)-β-d-glucans as rehydration media for improved redispersion of dried cellulose nanofibrils.
Zha L; Wang S; Berglund LA; Zhou Q
Carbohydr Polym; 2023 Jan; 300():120276. PubMed ID: 36372496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of different pre-treatments on the redispersion capacity of spray-dried microfibrillated cellulose: Elaboration and characterization of biofilms.
Setter C; Dias MC; Mascarenhas ARP; Tonoli GHD; de Oliveira TJP
Int J Biol Macromol; 2023 Jul; 243():125279. PubMed ID: 37301348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Effects of Sodium Chloride and Potassium Chloride on Spray Drying and Redispersion of Cellulose Nanofibrils Suspension.
Yang G; Ma G; He M; Ji X; Li W; Youn HJ; Lee HL; Chen J
Nanomaterials (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33572304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Cellulose Nanofibrils and TEMPO-mediated Oxidized Cellulose Nanofibrils on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Poly(vinylidene fluoride)/Cellulose Nanofibril Composites.
Barnes E; Jefcoat JA; Alberts EM; McKechnie MA; Peel HR; Buchanan JP; Weiss CA; Klaus KL; Mimun LC; Warner CM
Polymers (Basel); 2019 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 31252644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Redispersion and structural change evaluation of dried microfibrillated cellulose.
Silva LE; Dos Santos AA; Torres L; McCaffrey Z; Klamczynski A; Glenn G; Sena Neto AR; Wood D; Williams T; Orts W; Damásio RAP; Tonoli GHD
Carbohydr Polym; 2021 Jan; 252():117165. PubMed ID: 33183616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of drying method on the surface energy of cellulose nanofibrils determined by inverse gas chromatography.
Peng Y; Gardner DJ; Han Y; Cai Z; Tshabalala MA
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2013 Sep; 405():85-95. PubMed ID: 23786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Aqueous Grafting of Polystyrene through Methacrylate-Modified Cellulose Nanofibrils on Emulsion Stabilization and Drying Behavior.
Driscoll ME; Kelly PV; Gramlich WM
Langmuir; 2023 May; 39(20):7079-7090. PubMed ID: 37170894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Highly absorbent cellulose nanofibrils aerogels prepared by supercritical drying.
Darpentigny C; Nonglaton G; Bras J; Jean B
Carbohydr Polym; 2020 Feb; 229():115560. PubMed ID: 31826439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Double emulsions for the compatibilization of hydrophilic nanocellulose with non-polar polymers and validation in the synthesis of composite fibers.
Carrillo CA; Nypelö T; Rojas OJ
Soft Matter; 2016 Mar; 12(10):2721-8. PubMed ID: 26876673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strong, Water-Durable, and Wet-Resilient Cellulose Nanofibril-Stabilized Foams from Oven Drying.
Cervin NT; Johansson E; Larsson PA; Wågberg L
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2016 May; 8(18):11682-9. PubMed ID: 27070532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ion conductivity through TEMPO-mediated oxidated and periodate oxidated cellulose membranes.
Dahlström C; López Durán V; Keene ST; Salleo A; Norgren M; Wågberg L
Carbohydr Polym; 2020 Apr; 233():115829. PubMed ID: 32059883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regioselectively Carboxylated Cellulose Nanofibril Models from Dissolving Pulp: C6 via TEMPO Oxidation and C2,C3 via Periodate-Chlorite Oxidation.
Guo M; Ede JD; Sayes CM; Shatkin JA; Stark N; Hsieh YL
Nanomaterials (Basel); 2024 Mar; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 38470807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrodeposition of cellulose nanofibers as an efficient dehydration method.
Kasuga T; Li C; Mizui A; Ishioka S; Koga H; Nogi M
Carbohydr Polym; 2024 Sep; 340():122310. PubMed ID: 38858010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cellulose nanofibrils prepared by twin-screw extrusion: Effect of the fiber pretreatment on the fibrillation efficiency.
Trigui K; De Loubens C; Magnin A; Putaux JL; Boufi S
Carbohydr Polym; 2020 Jul; 240():116342. PubMed ID: 32475596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rheology of Suspensions of TEMPO-Oxidised and Cationic Cellulose Nanofibrils-The Effect of Chemical Pre-Treatment.
Alves L; Magalhães S; Pedrosa JFS; Ferreira PJT; Gamelas JAF; Rasteiro MG
Gels; 2024 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 38920914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaporative Dry Powders Derived from Cellulose Nanofiber Organogels to Fully Recover Inherent High Viscosity and High Transparency of Water Dispersion.
Yagyu H; Kasuga T; Ogata N; Koga H; Daicho K; Goi Y; Nogi M
Macromol Rapid Commun; 2023 Sep; 44(17):e2300186. PubMed ID: 37265024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface functionalization and size modulate the formation of reactive oxygen species and genotoxic effects of cellulose nanofibrils.
Aimonen K; Imani M; Hartikainen M; Suhonen S; Vanhala E; Moreno C; Rojas OJ; Norppa H; Catalán J
Part Fibre Toxicol; 2022 Mar; 19(1):19. PubMed ID: 35296350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
