These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37173589)

  • 21. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
    Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Word frequency effects on judgments of learning: More than just beliefs.
    Mendes PS; Luna K; Albuquerque PB
    J Gen Psychol; 2021; 148(2):124-148. PubMed ID: 31880498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time?
    Kelemen WL; Weaver CA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Nov; 23(6):1394-409. PubMed ID: 9372607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
    Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Memory and Executive Functions Subserving Judgments of Learning: Cognitive Reorganization After Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Ramanathan P; Liu R; Chen MH; Kennedy MRT
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2022 Oct; 32(9):2203-2226. PubMed ID: 34006181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of delayed judgments of learning on retention.
    Tekin E; Roediger HL
    Metacogn Learn; 2021; 16(2):407-429. PubMed ID: 33679269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning.
    Sikström S; Jönsson F
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):932-50. PubMed ID: 16262474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Soliciting judgments of forgetting reactively enhances memory as well as making judgments of learning: Empirical and meta-analytic tests.
    Li B; Zhao W; Zheng J; Hu X; Su N; Fan T; Yin Y; Liu M; Yang C; Luo L
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):1061-1077. PubMed ID: 34855150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Confidence ratings are better predictors of future performance than delayed judgments of learning.
    Putnam AL; Deng W; DeSoto KA
    Memory; 2022 May; 30(5):537-553. PubMed ID: 35037570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Multiple Cues In Addition to Memory for Past Test Accuracy.
    Hertzog C; Hines JC; Touron DR
    Arch Sci Psychol; 2013; 1(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 25914865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Judgments of Learning in Context: Backgrounds Can Both Reduce and Produce Metamemory Illusions.
    Tatz JR; Peynircioğlu ZF
    Mem Cognit; 2020 May; 48(4):581-595. PubMed ID: 31732926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Caffeine cravings impair memory and metacognition.
    Palmer MA; Sauer JD; Ling A; Riza J
    Memory; 2017 Oct; 25(9):1225-1234. PubMed ID: 28276980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):976-88. PubMed ID: 22399224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Immediate judgments of learning predict subsequent recollection: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 22732027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention.
    Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.