These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37174945)

  • 1. Prediction of the Post-Pubertal Mandibular Length and Y Axis of Growth by Using Various Machine Learning Techniques: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Wood T; Anigbo JO; Eckert G; Stewart KT; Dundar MM; Turkkahraman H
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Apr; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 37174945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cephalometric Characteristic of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Javanese Population at Universitas Airlangga Dental Hospital.
    Ardani IGAW; Sanjaya ML; Sjamsudin J
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018 Sep; 9(Suppl 2):S342-S346. PubMed ID: 30294169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation.
    Mellion ZJ; Behrents RG; Johnston LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):845-54. PubMed ID: 23726335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semi-longitudinal Study of the Mcnamara Cephalometric Triangle in Class II and Class III Subjects Grouped by Cervical Vertebrae Maturation Stage.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Fitzcarrald FD; Flores-Mir C
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2015 Dec; 28(3):222-30. PubMed ID: 27095622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Opening rotations of the mandible during and after treatment.
    Ryan MJ; Schneider BJ; BeGole EA; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 9714278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study.
    Nardoni DN; Siqueira DF; Cardoso Mde A; Capelozza Filho L
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 25741830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in Class II division 1 subjects.
    Ngan PW; Byczek E; Scheick J
    Semin Orthod; 1997 Dec; 3(4):222-31. PubMed ID: 9573884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Redirecting mandibular growth through orthodontic dentoalveolar height development in growing patients with Class III malocclusion undergoing maxillary orthopedic protraction.
    Loca-Apichai P; Jein-Wein Liou E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Oct; 162(4):510-519. PubMed ID: 35840438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethnicity and skeletal Class III morphology: a pubertal growth analysis using thin-plate spline analysis.
    Alkhamrah B; Terada K; Yamaki M; Ali IM; Hanada K
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(4):243-54. PubMed ID: 12390002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment.
    Kim KR; Muhl ZF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):522-30. PubMed ID: 11343025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Aras A; Ada E; Saracoğlu H; Gezer NS; Aras I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):616-25. PubMed ID: 22051481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distribution of Various Maxilla-Mandibular Positions and Cephalometric Comparison in Chinese Skeletal Class II Malocclusions.
    Xiong X; Huang Y; Liu W; Wu Y; Yi Y; Wang J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):822-828. PubMed ID: 33568599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A special method of predicting mandibular growth potential for Class III malocclusion.
    Chen F; Terada K; Hanada K
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 15825781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The accuracy of computerized growth prediction in Class II high-angle cases.
    Thames TL; Sinclair PM; Alexander RG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 May; 87(5):398-405. PubMed ID: 3857865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. To Evaluate the Correlation Between Skeletal and Dental Parameters to the Amount of Crowding in Class II Div. 1 Malocclusions.
    Singh S; Shivaprakash G
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Sep; 11(9):ZC22-ZC27. PubMed ID: 29207827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth.
    Aki T; Nanda RS; Currier GF; Nanda SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jul; 106(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 8017351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.