180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37175878)
1. A Split-Marker System for CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing in Methylotrophic Yeasts.
Karginov AV; Tarutina MG; Lapteva AR; Pakhomova MD; Galliamov AA; Filkin SY; Fedorov AN; Agaphonov MO
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 May; 24(9):. PubMed ID: 37175878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficient genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9 with a tRNA-sgRNA fusion in the methylotrophic yeast Ogataea polymorpha.
Numamoto M; Maekawa H; Kaneko Y
J Biosci Bioeng; 2017 Nov; 124(5):487-492. PubMed ID: 28666889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construction of a series of episomal plasmids and their application in the development of an efficient CRISPR/Cas9 system in Pichia pastoris.
Gu Y; Gao J; Cao M; Dong C; Lian J; Huang L; Cai J; Xu Z
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 May; 35(6):79. PubMed ID: 31134410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system with an eliminable episomal sgRNA plasmid in Pichia pastoris.
Yang Y; Liu G; Chen X; Liu M; Zhan C; Liu X; Bai Z
Enzyme Microb Technol; 2020 Aug; 138():109556. PubMed ID: 32527526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combinatorial optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 expression enables precision genome engineering in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris.
Weninger A; Hatzl AM; Schmid C; Vogl T; Glieder A
J Biotechnol; 2016 Oct; 235():139-49. PubMed ID: 27015975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Forced Recycling of an AMA1-Based Genome-Editing Plasmid Allows for Efficient Multiple Gene Deletion/Integration in the Industrial Filamentous Fungus
Katayama T; Nakamura H; Zhang Y; Pascal A; Fujii W; Maruyama JI
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 85(3):. PubMed ID: 30478227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Targeted editing of transcriptional activator MXR1 on the Pichia pastoris genome using CRISPR/Cas9 technology.
Hou C; Yang Y; Xing Y; Zhan C; Liu G; Liu X; Liu C; Zhan J; Xu D; Bai Z
Yeast; 2020 Apr; 37(4):305-312. PubMed ID: 32050051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [An efficient marker-free genome editing method for
Shen Y; Chen Z; Chen J; Zhao B; Lü J; Gui L; Lu F; Li M
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2022 Dec; 38(12):4744-4755. PubMed ID: 36593207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Editing of the Bacillus subtilis Genome by the CRISPR-Cas9 System.
Altenbuchner J
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 82(17):5421-7. PubMed ID: 27342565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genome editing in Kluyveromyces and Ogataea yeasts using a broad-host-range Cas9/gRNA co-expression plasmid.
Juergens H; Varela JA; Gorter de Vries AR; Perli T; Gast VJM; Gyurchev NY; Rajkumar AS; Mans R; Pronk JT; Morrissey JP; Daran JG
FEMS Yeast Res; 2018 May; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 29438517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expanding the CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for Pichia pastoris with efficient donor integration and alternative resistance markers.
Weninger A; Fischer JE; Raschmanová H; Kniely C; Vogl T; Glieder A
J Cell Biochem; 2018 Apr; 119(4):3183-3198. PubMed ID: 29091307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of CRISPR-MAD7 and CRISPR-Cas9 for Gene Disruptions in
Smirnov K; Weiss F; Hatzl AM; Rieder L; Olesen K; Jensen S; Glieder A
J Fungi (Basel); 2024 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 38535206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A RecET-assisted CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in Corynebacterium glutamicum.
Wang B; Hu Q; Zhang Y; Shi R; Chai X; Liu Z; Shang X; Zhang Y; Wen T
Microb Cell Fact; 2018 Apr; 17(1):63. PubMed ID: 29685154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heterologous Single-Strand DNA-Annealing and Binding Protein Enhance CRISPR-Based Genome Editing Efficiency in
Deng M; Wu Y; Lv X; Liu L; Li J; Du G; Chen J; Liu Y
ACS Synth Biol; 2023 Nov; 12(11):3443-3453. PubMed ID: 37881961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A redesigned CRISPR/Cas9 system for marker-free genome editing in Plasmodium falciparum.
Lu J; Tong Y; Pan J; Yang Y; Liu Q; Tan X; Zhao S; Qin L; Chen X
Parasit Vectors; 2016 Apr; 9():198. PubMed ID: 27066899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic investigation of CRISPR-Cas9 configurations for flexible and efficient genome editing in Corynebacterium glutamicum NRRL-B11474.
Cameron Coates R; Blaskowski S; Szyjka S; van Rossum HM; Vallandingham J; Patel K; Serber Z; Dean J
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 Feb; 46(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 30484125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cationic Polymer-Mediated CRISPR/Cas9 Plasmid Delivery for Genome Editing.
Zhang Z; Wan T; Chen Y; Chen Y; Sun H; Cao T; Songyang Z; Tang G; Wu C; Ping Y; Xu FJ; Huang J
Macromol Rapid Commun; 2019 Mar; 40(5):e1800068. PubMed ID: 29708298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Plasmid-free CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nishimura A; Tanahashi R; Oi T; Kan K; Takagi H
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem; 2023 Mar; 87(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 36694939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Homology-Directed Genome Editing in Pichia pastoris.
Gassler T; Heistinger L; Mattanovich D; Gasser B; Prielhofer R
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1923():211-225. PubMed ID: 30737742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A versatile toolbox for CRISPR-based genome engineering in Pichia pastoris.
Liao X; Li L; Jameel A; Xing XH; Zhang C
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2021 Dec; 105(24):9211-9218. PubMed ID: 34773154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
