These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37177302)

  • 21. Three dimensional ink-jet printing of biomaterials using ionic liquids and co-solvents.
    Gunasekera DH; Kuek S; Hasanaj D; He Y; Tuck C; Croft AK; Wildman RD
    Faraday Discuss; 2016 Aug; 190():509-23. PubMed ID: 27231729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Printability assessment of psyllium husk (isabgol)/gelatin blends using rheological and mechanical properties.
    Agarwal PS; Poddar S; Varshney N; Sahi AK; Vajanthri KY; Yadav K; Parmar AS; Mahto SK
    J Biomater Appl; 2021 Apr; 35(9):1132-1142. PubMed ID: 33377809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Design of drug-loaded 3D printing biomaterial inks and tailor-made pharmaceutical forms for controlled release.
    Olmos-Juste R; Guaresti O; Calvo-Correas T; Gabilondo N; Eceiza A
    Int J Pharm; 2021 Nov; 609():121124. PubMed ID: 34597726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Insight into the correlations among rheological behaviour, protein molecular structure and 3D printability during the processing of surimi from golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus).
    Liu Y; Sun Q; Wei S; Xia Q; Pan Y; Ji H; Deng C; Hao J; Liu S
    Food Chem; 2022 Mar; 371():131046. PubMed ID: 34537614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mapping 3D Printability of Ionically Cross-Linked Cellulose Nanocrystal Inks: Architecting from Nano- to Macroscale Structures.
    Amini M; Kamkar M; Ahmadijokani F; Ghaderi S; Rojas OJ; Hosseini H; Arjmand M
    Biomacromolecules; 2023 Feb; 24(2):775-788. PubMed ID: 36546647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Simulations of 3D bioprinting: predicting bioprintability of nanofibrillar inks.
    Göhl J; Markstedt K; Mark A; Håkansson K; Gatenholm P; Edelvik F
    Biofabrication; 2018 Jun; 10(3):034105. PubMed ID: 29809162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rheological properties of cellulose nanofiber hydrogel for high-fidelity 3D printing.
    Shin S; Hyun J
    Carbohydr Polym; 2021 Jul; 263():117976. PubMed ID: 33858573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 3D printing of a bio-based ink made of cross-linked cellulose nanofibrils with various metal cations.
    Mietner JB; Jiang X; Edlund U; Saake B; Navarro JRG
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6461. PubMed ID: 33742068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Control of maleic acid-propylene diepoxide hydrogel for 3D printing application for flexible tissue engineering scaffold with high resolution by end capping and graft polymerization.
    Tran HN; Kim IG; Kim JH; Chung EJ; Noh I
    Biomater Res; 2022 Dec; 26(1):75. PubMed ID: 36494708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 3D Bioprinting of Pectin-Cellulose Nanofibers Multicomponent Bioinks.
    Pitton M; Fiorati A; Buscemi S; Melone L; Farè S; Contessi Negrini N
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():732689. PubMed ID: 34926414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Composites of waterborne polyurethane and cellulose nanofibers for 3D printing and bioapplications.
    Chen RD; Huang CF; Hsu SH
    Carbohydr Polym; 2019 May; 212():75-88. PubMed ID: 30832883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of triglycerol diacrylate on the printability and properties of UV curable, bio-based nanohydroxyapatite composites.
    Diederichs EV; Mondal D; Patil H; Gorbet M; Willett TL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 May; 153():106499. PubMed ID: 38490049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Balancing Functionality and Printability: High-Loading Polymer Resins for Direct Ink Writing.
    Legett SA; Torres X; Schmalzer AM; Pacheco A; Stockdale JR; Talley S; Robison T; Labouriau A
    Polymers (Basel); 2022 Nov; 14(21):. PubMed ID: 36365651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Printability of Poly(lactic acid) Ink by Embedded 3D Printing
    Karyappa R; Liu H; Zhu Q; Hashimoto M
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 May; 15(17):21575-21584. PubMed ID: 37078653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bioinspired 3D printable pectin-nanocellulose ink formulations.
    Cernencu AI; Lungu A; Stancu IC; Serafim A; Heggset E; Syverud K; Iovu H
    Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Sep; 220():12-21. PubMed ID: 31196530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of 3D-bioprinted nanocellulose and cellulose derivative-based bio-inks in bone and cartilage tissue engineering.
    Lin L; Jiang S; Yang J; Qiu J; Jiao X; Yue X; Ke X; Yang G; Zhang L
    Int J Bioprint; 2023; 9(1):637. PubMed ID: 36844245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Solvent Mediating the
    Zhang R; Deng L; Guo J; Yang H; Zhang L; Cao X; Yu A; Duan B
    ACS Nano; 2021 Nov; 15(11):17790-17803. PubMed ID: 34714040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Printability of Nixtamalized Corn Dough during Screw-Based Three-Dimensional Food Printing.
    Rodríguez-Herrera VV; Umeda T; Kozu H; Sasaki T; Kobayashi I
    Foods; 2024 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38254594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Composite Inks for Extrusion Printing of Biological and Biomedical Constructs.
    Ravanbakhsh H; Bao G; Luo Z; Mongeau LG; Zhang YS
    ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2021 Sep; 7(9):4009-4026. PubMed ID: 34510905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of cellulose nanofibers to remove water-based flexographic inks from wastewaters.
    Balea A; Monte MC; de la Fuente E; Negro C; Blanco Á
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Feb; 24(5):5049-5059. PubMed ID: 28000073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.