These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37177774)

  • 1. Scenario Generation for Autonomous Vehicles with Deep-Learning-Based Heterogeneous Driver Models: Implementation and Verification.
    Gao L; Zhou R; Zhang K
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(9):. PubMed ID: 37177774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple Event-Based Simulation Scenario Generation Approach for Autonomous Vehicle Smart Sensors and Devices.
    Park J; Wen M; Sung Y; Cho K
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 31615164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety assessment for autonomous vehicles: A reference driver model for highway merging scenarios.
    Wang C; Guo F; Zhao S; Zhu Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 206():107710. PubMed ID: 39018627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Autonomous driving testing scenario generation based on in-depth vehicle-to-powered two-wheeler crash data in China.
    Wang X; Peng Y; Xu T; Xu Q; Wu X; Xiang G; Yi S; Wang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Oct; 176():106812. PubMed ID: 36054982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accelerated Evaluation of Automated Vehicles Safety in Lane-Change Scenarios Based on Importance Sampling Techniques.
    Zhao D; Lam H; Peng H; Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Nobukawa K; Pan CS
    IEEE trans Intell Transp Syst; 2017 Mar; 18(3):595-607. PubMed ID: 27840592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety evaluation method in multi-logical scenarios for automated vehicles based on naturalistic driving trajectory.
    Zhang P; Zhu B; Zhao J; Fan T; Sun Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106926. PubMed ID: 36543079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a Framework for Generating Driving Safety Assessment Scenarios for Automated Vehicles.
    Ko W; Park S; Yun J; Park S; Yun I
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Aug; 22(16):. PubMed ID: 36015798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing car-following behaviors of human drivers when following automated vehicles using the real-world dataset.
    Wen X; Cui Z; Jian S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106689. PubMed ID: 35569279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review on Functional Testing Scenario Library Generation for Connected and Automated Vehicles.
    Zhu Y; Wang J; Meng F; Liu T
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human-like car-following model for autonomous vehicles considering the cut-in behavior of other vehicles in mixed traffic.
    Fu R; Li Z; Sun Q; Wang C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105260. PubMed ID: 31442924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autonomous Driving Control Based on the Technique of Semantic Segmentation.
    Tsai J; Chang CC; Li T
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36679688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of freeway-based test scenarios for applying new car assessment program to automated vehicles.
    Ko W; Park S; Park S; Jeong H; Yun I
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271532. PubMed ID: 35862304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the associations between driving volatility and autonomous vehicle hazardous scenarios: Insights from field operational test data.
    Yu R; Li S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106537. PubMed ID: 34952369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.
    Mahdinia I; Mohammadnazar A; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106006. PubMed ID: 33556655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of an Effective Corruption-Related Scenario-Based Testing Approach for Robustness Verification and Enhancement of Perception Systems in Autonomous Driving.
    Hsiang H; Chen YY
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 38203163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrogastrography in Autonomous Vehicles-An Objective Method for Assessment of Motion Sickness in Simulated Driving Environments.
    Gruden T; Popović NB; Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Miljković N; Tomažič S; Sodnik J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33466805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment.
    Chrysler ST; Ahmad O; Schwarz CW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S12-7. PubMed ID: 26027964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unusual Driver Behavior Detection in Videos Using Deep Learning Models.
    Abosaq HA; Ramzan M; Althobiani F; Abid A; Aamir KM; Abdushkour H; Irfan M; Gommosani ME; Ghonaim SM; Shamji VR; Rahman S
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36616911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.