197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37178027)
1. Graft subsidence and reoperation after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched and cost analysis of polyetheretherketone versus 3D-printed porous titanium interbodies.
Alan N; Deng H; Muthiah N; Vodovotz L; Dembinski R; Guha D; Agarwal N; Ozpinar A; Hamilton DK; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 37178027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cage: single-institution case series.
Alan N; Vodovotz L; Muthiah N; Deng H; Guha D; Agarwal N; Ozpinar A; Mushlin HM; Puccio L; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Nov; 37(5):663-669. PubMed ID: 35594892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.
Adl Amini D; Okano I; Oezel L; Zhu J; Chiapparelli E; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2377-2384. PubMed ID: 34215921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.
Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early Outcomes of Three-Dimensional-Printed Porous Titanium versus Polyetheretherketone Cage Implantation for Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Degeneration.
Adl Amini D; Moser M; Oezel L; Zhu J; Okano I; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e14-e20. PubMed ID: 34863938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Duan Y; Feng D; Li T; Wang Y; Jiang L; Huang Y
World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():144-156. PubMed ID: 38145654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comment on "Graft Subsidence and Reoperation After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched and Cost Analysis of Polyetheretherketone versus 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Interbodies".
Muthiah N; Alan N
World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():234-235. PubMed ID: 37748948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.
Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X
Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Analysis of Radiologic Outcomes Between Polyetheretherketone and Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Sultana T; Hossain M; Jeong JH; Im S
World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e241-e255. PubMed ID: 37611804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies.
Patel NA; O’Bryant S; Rogers CD; Boyett CK; Chakravarti S; Gendreau J; Brown NJ; Pennington ZA; Hatcher NB; Kuo C; Diaz-Aguilar LD; Pham MH
Neurospine; 2023 Jun; 20(2):451-463. PubMed ID: 37401063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.
Laratta JL; Vivace BJ; López-Peña M; Guzón FM; Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra A; Jorge-Mora A; Villar-Liste RM; Pino-Lopez L; Lukyanchuk A; Taghizadeh EA; Pino-Minguez J
Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1016-1027. PubMed ID: 34906741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Graft subsidence as a predictor of revision surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
Tempel ZJ; McDowell MM; Panczykowski DM; Gandhoke GS; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 29125429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Promotion of higher rates of early fusion using activated titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in adults undergoing 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a randomized controlled trial.
Toop N; Dhaliwal J; Gifford CS; Gibbs D; Keister A; Miracle S; Forghani R; Grossbach AJ; Farhadi HF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Nov; 39(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 37542447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early revision events among patients with a three dimensional (3D) printed cellular titanium or PEEK (polyetheretherketone) spinal cage for single-level lumbar spinal fusion.
Corso KA; Kothari P; Corrado K; Michielli A; Ruppenkamp J; Bowden D
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Feb; 19(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 34937486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Long-term Follow-Up of n-HA PA66 Cage and PEEK Cage of Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multi-level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: A Stepwise Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Li Q; Gao Q; Wang L; Liu L; Yang H; Song Y
Orthop Surg; 2024 Jan; 16(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 37953456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Poor Bone Quality, Multilevel Surgery, and Narrow and Tall Cages Are Associated with Intraoperative Endplate Injuries and Late-onset Cage Subsidence in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.
Wu H; Shan Z; Zhao F; Cheung JPY
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan; 480(1):163-188. PubMed ID: 34324459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparison of Polyetheretherketone and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Singhatanadgige W; Tangchitcharoen N; Kerr SJ; Tanasansomboon T; Yingsakmongkol W; Kotheeranurak V; Limthongkul W
World Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 168():e471-e479. PubMed ID: 36216250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduced Subsidence With PEEK-Titanium Composite Versus 3D Titanium Cages in a Retrospective, Self-Controlled Study in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Chahlavi A
Global Spine J; 2024 May; ():21925682241253168. PubMed ID: 38780086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes between the n-HA/PA66 Cage and the PEEK Cage Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Matched-Pair Case Control Study.
Zhang Z; Hu BW; Wang L; Yang HL; Li T; Liu LM; Yang X; Song YM
Orthop Surg; 2023 Jan; 15(1):152-161. PubMed ID: 36398388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
