249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37178967)
1. Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state.
Hao KA; Hones KM; O'Keefe DS; Saengchote SA; Burns MQ; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Struk AM; Simovitch RW; Schoch BS; King JJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Oct; 32(10):e516-e527. PubMed ID: 37178967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal and substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement.
Hao KA; Hones KM; O'Keefe DS; Saengchote SA; Turnbull LM; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Struk AM; Simovitch RW; Schoch BS; King JJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Mar; 33(3):593-603. PubMed ID: 37778654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stratification of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty by Implant Type, Preoperative Diagnosis, and Sex.
Simovitch RW; Elwell J; Colasanti CA; Hao KA; Friedman RJ; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Schoch BS; Roche CP; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38461936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes after prior contralateral anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with bilateral primary osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff.
Turnbull LM; Hao KA; Bindi VE; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Vasilopoulos T; Struk AM; Schoch BS; King JJ
Int Orthop; 2024 Mar; 48(3):801-807. PubMed ID: 38032497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying success after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement.
Nieboer MJ; Hao KA; Tams C; King JJ; Wright TW; Parsons M; Schoch BS; Simovitch RW
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Dec; 32(12):2501-2507. PubMed ID: 37302621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What Is the Accuracy of Three Different Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Clinical Outcomes After Shoulder Arthroplasty?
Kumar V; Roche C; Overman S; Simovitch R; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman J; Routman H; Teredesai A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 478(10):2351-2363. PubMed ID: 32332242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a patient-matched glenoid implant for severe glenoid bone deficiency.
Michelin RM; Manuputy I; Rangarajan R; Lee BK; Schultzel M; Itamura JM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jun; 33(6S):S93-S103. PubMed ID: 38492629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does achieving clinically important thresholds after first shoulder arthroplasty predict similar outcomes of the contralateral shoulder?
Turnbull LM; Hao KA; Srinivasan RC; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Vasilopoulos T; Struk AM; Schoch BS; King JJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Apr; 33(4):880-887. PubMed ID: 37690587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-year clinical outcomes and complication rates in anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty implanted with Exactech GPS intraoperative navigation.
Youderian AR; Greene AT; Polakovic SV; Davis NZ; Parsons M; Papandrea RF; Jones RB; Byram IR; Gobbato BB; Wright TW; Flurin PH; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Dec; 32(12):2519-2532. PubMed ID: 37348780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Augmented baseplates yield optimum outcomes when compared with bone graft augmentation for managing glenoid deformity during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative study.
Colasanti CA; Lin CC; Ross KA; Luthringer T; Elwell JA; Roche CP; Virk MS; Simovitch RW; Routman HD; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 May; 32(5):958-971. PubMed ID: 36400341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are Age and Patient Gender Associated With Different Rates and Magnitudes of Clinical Improvement After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty?
Friedman RJ; Cheung EV; Flurin PH; Wright T; Simovitch RW; Bolch C; Roche CP; Zuckerman JD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1264-1273. PubMed ID: 29601384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of the Walch classification for patients before and after shoulder arthroplasty performed for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff.
Simovitch RW; Hao KA; Elwell J; Antuna S; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Schoch BS; Roche CP; Ehrlich ZA; Colasanti C; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; 33(1):108-120. PubMed ID: 37778653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of clinical outcomes of revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed primary anatomic vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Hao KA; Boschert EN; O'Keefe DS; Saengchote SA; Schoch BS; Wright JO; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Struk AM; King JJ
JSES Int; 2023 Mar; 7(2):257-263. PubMed ID: 36911771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty achieve clinically significant outcomes faster than those undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Drager J; Polce EM; Fu M; Nemsick M; Huddleston HP; Forsythe B; Nicholson GP; Cole BJ; Verma NN; Garrigues GE
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2523-2532. PubMed ID: 33711501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as primary versus revision procedure for proximal humerus fractures.
Dezfuli B; King JJ; Farmer KW; Struk AM; Wright TW
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1133-7. PubMed ID: 26897312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty?
Werner BC; Chang B; Nguyen JT; Dines DM; Gulotta LV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Dec; 474(12):2672-2681. PubMed ID: 27392769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis with preoperative external rotation weakness and an intact rotator cuff: a case-control study.
Hones KM; Hao KA; Trammell AP; Wright JO; Wright TW; Vasilopoulos T; Schoch BS; King JJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Apr; 33(4):e185-e197. PubMed ID: 37660887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantifying success after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement.
Nieboer MJ; Hao KA; Tams C; King JJ; Wright TW; Simovitch RW; Parsons M; Schoch BS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2296-2302. PubMed ID: 37245623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis with preoperative rotational stiffness and an intact rotator cuff: a case control study.
Hao KA; Greene AT; Werthel JD; Wright JO; King JJ; Wright TW; Vasilopoulos T; Schoch BS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jul; 32(7):e355-e365. PubMed ID: 36737034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference.
Simovitch R; Flurin PH; Wright T; Zuckerman JD; Roche CP
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Feb; 27(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 29162305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
